CATCHWORDS
Bankruptcy - bankruptcy notice - application for extension
| of time with requirements | - exerclse of discretion. |
| LOCKHART J. | |
| 27 MAY 1980 |
L
| IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA | 1 |
| BAKKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF | THE STATE |
NO. n 5300 of 1979
OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND THE
I
| AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY | I |
| RE : | ROSS | STUDWELL |
| EX PARTE: | AUSTRALIAN | FIBREGLASS |
PTY. LIMITED
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
LOCKHART J.
Thls 1 s an appllcatlon by Ross Studwell ("the
appllcant") for an order that tune for compllance wlth
bankruptcy notlce No. Sj3OO of 1979 be extended for such
| tune as may be | necessary for the completlon of proceedlngs |
| to set aslde | the judgment on whlch the bankruptcy notlce 1 s |
| based. |
| Judgment was obtalned by Australlan Flbreglass | Pty. |
Llmlted ("the respondent") agalnst the appllcant In the
| Supreme Court of Xew South Wales on | 3 0 July 1973 In the sum |
| of $44,000.00. |
In the proceedlngs In the Supreme Court of New South Wales the respondent clalmed that the appllcant and others, lncludlng one Iievln Alan StUdh-ell, 111 conslderatlon of the respondent extendlng credlt t o SLudh-ell Pty. Llmltcd ("the company"), agreed In wrltlng on 13 September 197; that In the event of the non-payment of certaln bllls of exchange on the due dates by the company, they would furnlsh to the
| respondent bank cheques | for the amounts referred to m each |
| . . | . / 2 |
| ! | l . |
-3-
| The assertlon by the appllcant that he was not | served |
personally wlth the statement of clalm provldes no reason for
the success of thls appllcatlon.
As in the case of Kevln A l a n Studwell, appllcatlon
was made by the appllcant for leave to amend the appllcatlon
| to seek the Same rellef as was | sought In the case of Kevln |
| Alan Studwell. | Its fate 1s the same. |
I make the followlng orders:-
1. I refuse to grant leave to the appllcant to
amend the appllcatlon by seeklng orders that
bankruptcy notlce B j 3 O O of 1979 be set aslde In the
exerclse of the court's Inherent Jurlsdlctlon;
2 . I dlsmiss the appllcatlon of l 9 October 1979;
| I | termlnate the order previously made extendlng |
tune for compllance wlth the requlrements of the
bankruptcy notlce untll further order;
| h . | I release the appllcant from hls undertaklng |
to the Court by hls counsel that he would not, untll
the determlnatlon of the appllcatlon or further order,
| dlspose of, deal | wlth, mortgage, pledge o r encumber |
any of hls assets otherwise than In the ordlnary course
of buslness o r for the purpose of meeting ordmary
llvlng expenses or legal costs;
order the appllcant to pay the respondent's
costs of the appllcatlons before the Court Includlng
reserved costs.
- AGLC
- Studwell, Ross v Australian Fibreglass Pty Ltd [1980] FCA 76
- Case
- [1980] FCA 76
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the legal issues surrounding the exercise of discretion to extend the time for compliance with the bankruptcy notice and whether the applicant's personal non-service of the statement of claim provided a valid reason for the extension. Additionally, the court examined the application to amend the original application to seek the same relief as in a related case involving Kevin Alan Studwell, which was similarly denied. The court's reasoning was grounded in the insufficiency of the applicant's reasons and the lack of any new evidence that would warrant a reconsideration of the original decision.
In its judgment, the Court refused to grant the applicant leave to amend the application to seek the same relief as in the related case. The Court dismissed the application of 19 October 1979, terminated the previously made order extending time for compliance with the bankruptcy notice until further order, released the applicant from his undertaking to the Court, and ordered the applicant to pay the respondent's costs of the applications before the Court including reserved costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.