Stubberfield & Stubberfield v Paradise Grove P/L

Case [2000] QCA 526


[2000] QCA 526

COURT OF APPEAL

McMURDO P

No 2071 of 2000

JOHN RICHARD STUBBERFIELD AND
MRS STUBBERFIELD                  Appellants (Defendants)

and

PARADISE GROVE PTY LTD
(ACN 053 003 302)                  Respondent (Plaintiff)

BRISBANE

..DATE 22/12/2000

JUDGMENT

HER HONOUR:  This matter has quite a long history.  The notice of appeal was originally filed in early March this year.  The appellant has still not filed a record book and the matter is currently listed for hearing on 13 February 2001.

The appellant has requested that his appeal be placed in abeyance pending his petition to Parliament for an independent inquiry as to the subject matter of the appeal.  This Court is of course not prepared to accede to the appellant's request and the appeal must be progressed.

It is an appeal in respect of interlocutory orders and as such should be given some priority.  There has been a dispute as to the contents of the record book.  I have explained to the appellant that the record book must relate only to matters relied upon by him that were before the primary Judge and that any extraneous material should be prepared in a form that can be placed before the Appeal Court who can then consider whether it is relevant.

The appellant in effect asks for an extension of time within which to file his appeal record book and has also asked for an adjournment of the trial from its listing in February of about five weeks because he is self-represented and needs to file a defence in a pending Magistrates Court action and also has to meet overdue requirements to the Tax Office.

The respondent does not oppose the appellant's application for an extension of time within which to file the appeal record book until the end of January or for an appeal hearing in March but is keen nevertheless to progress the matter.  This mention of course would not have been necessary but for the failure of the appellant to meet his timetable and for those reasons he should pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to this hearing. 

I direct the appellant file and serve the appeal record book in the form directed by the Deputy Registrar by 31 January 2001.  The appeal is adjourned to a date to be fixed by the Deputy Registrar for hearing in March.  The appellant is to pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to this application to be assessed.

‑‑‑‑‑

Details
AGLC
Stubberfield and Stubberfield v Paradise Grove P/L [2000] QCA 526
Case
[2000] QCA 526
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Court of Appeal in Queensland heard an appeal brought by John Richard Stubberfield and Mrs. Stubberfield against Paradise Grove P/L. The appeal concerns interlocutory orders from a previous proceeding, and the matter has a lengthy history. The appellants, who are self-represented, have not yet filed a record book for their appeal, which was initially filed in early March of the current year. The appeal is currently scheduled for hearing in February of the following year.

The central legal issues in the appeal revolve around the appellants' request for an extension to file the appeal record book and a request for an adjournment of the trial. The appellants cited their self-representation in another pending matter and overdue obligations to the Tax Office as reasons for their requests. The respondent, Paradise Grove P/L, did not oppose the appellants' request for an extension but emphasised the need to progress the matter. The appellants were ordered to pay the respondent's costs incurred due to their failure to adhere to the scheduled timetable.

The court denied the appellants' request to place the appeal in abeyance pending a petition to Parliament for an independent inquiry. The appellants were directed to file and serve their appeal record book by 31 January of the following year, and the appeal was adjourned to a date to be fixed by the Deputy Registrar for hearing in March. The appellants were further directed to pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application, which are to be assessed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.