Stuart and Bland
Case
•
[2013] FamCA 1159
•6 September 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Stuart and Bland [2013] FamCA 1159
[2013] FamCA 1159
6 September 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The matter of *Stuart and Bland* came before Tree J in the Family Court of Australia. The dispute concerned an application to vary an existing order regarding weekly payments. The applicant sought to decrease the amount payable under the order up until a specified date and to vary the amount payable thereafter.
The central legal issue before the court was whether to vary the existing order concerning weekly payments, specifically by reducing the amount payable for a defined period and increasing it thereafter. This required the court to consider the circumstances justifying such a variation and the appropriate figures to be substituted into the order.
Tree J determined that a variation of the existing order was warranted. The court ordered that the amount payable under the order be decreased to $750 per week up until 6 September 2013. Going forward from 6 September 2013, the amount payable was varied to $1250 per week. The costs of the hearing were reserved.
The central legal issue before the court was whether to vary the existing order concerning weekly payments, specifically by reducing the amount payable for a defined period and increasing it thereafter. This required the court to consider the circumstances justifying such a variation and the appropriate figures to be substituted into the order.
Tree J determined that a variation of the existing order was warranted. The court ordered that the amount payable under the order be decreased to $750 per week up until 6 September 2013. Going forward from 6 September 2013, the amount payable was varied to $1250 per week. The costs of the hearing were reserved.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Stuart and Bland [2013] FamCA 1159
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1