Strong and Strong and Anor

In the matter of *Strong and Strong and Anor*, the applicants sought a stay of a decision made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal on 21 June 2016. The specific nature of the dispute before the Tribunal and the identities of the respondents beyond the applicants are not detailed in the provided text. The application for a stay was heard by Judge Cassidy.

The central legal issue before Judge Cassidy was whether the applicants had established sufficient grounds to warrant an interlocutory stay of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal's decision. This required the court to consider the relevant legal tests for granting such an extraordinary remedy.

Judge Cassidy dismissed the application for a stay. While the specific reasoning is not elaborated in the provided text, the outcome indicates that the applicants failed to satisfy the necessary legal threshold for granting a stay of the Tribunal's decision. The court's decision implies that the applicants did not demonstrate a strong likelihood of success on the merits of their substantive appeal, nor that they would suffer irreparable harm if the stay were not granted, or that the balance of convenience favoured granting the stay.

The court ordered that the interlocutory application for a stay of the decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal dated 21 June 2016 be dismissed.