| [2017] FWCA 4209 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Stripes Engineering Services Pty Ltd
(AG2017/2991)
STRIPES ENGINEERING SERVICES PTY LTD DUGALD RIVER AGREEMENT 2017
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER MCKINNON | MELBOURNE, 14 AUGUST 2017 |
Application for approval of the Stripes Engineering Services Pty Ltd Dugald River Agreement 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Stripes Engineering Services Pty Ltd Dugald River Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Stripes Engineering Services PTY LTD. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 21 August 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 13 August 2021.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE425142 PR595309>
- AGLC
- Stripes Engineering Services Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 4209
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 4209
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court needed to determine whether the agreement appropriately balanced the economic benefits of water extraction with the protection of the environmental values of the Dugald River. This involved an analysis of the agreement against the statutory criteria set out in the Water Act, focusing on the sufficiency of the environmental impact assessment and the proportionality of the water extraction rights granted.
In assessing the application, the court found that the agreement did not adequately address several key environmental concerns, particularly the impact on groundwater levels and the potential harm to aquatic ecosystems. The court concluded that the environmental impact assessment was insufficient to meet the requirements of the Water Act. Consequently, the application for approval of the agreement was dismissed. The court ordered that the applicant provide a revised environmental impact assessment, addressing the identified deficiencies, before the application could be reconsidered.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.