[2013] FWCA 622 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Strategic Marine Pty Ltd
(AG2013/4246)
STRATEGIC MARINE PTY LTD REVERSE LOGISTICS OPERATIONS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Stevedoring industry | |
COMMISSIONER CLOGHAN | PERTH, 25 JANUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Strategic Marine Pty Ltd Reverse Logistics Operations Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] On 7 January 2013, Strategic Marine Pty Ltd made application for approval of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the Strategic Marine Pty Ltd Reverse Logistics Operations Enterprise Agreement 2012 (“the Agreement”). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the FW Act”).
[2] The Agreement was made following a ballot on 21 December 2012.
[3] Having received an explanation from the Applicant, I am satisfied that, in the circumstances, it is fair to extend the period for filing the application to 7 January 2013.
[4] The Fair Work Commission must approve an enterprise agreement pursuant to s.186 of the FW Act if the requirements set out in that section, s.187 and s.188 are met.
[5] Pursuant to s.190 of the FW Act, the Applicant has given an undertaking in relation to Clause 5 - Wages which is attached and forms part of the Agreement.
[6] I am satisfied, from the material provided to the Commission, that ss.186, 187 and 188, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[7] The Agreement is approved and will, in accordance with s.54(1) of the FW Act, operate from 1 February 2013.
[8] The nominal expiry date of this Agreement is 2 January 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE899588 PR533563>
- AGLC
- Strategic Marine Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 622
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 622
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission found that the agreement did not provide for the fair and efficient management of the workplace as it failed to include an adequate process for resolving disputes between employees and the employer. The Commission also found that the agreement was not appropriate for the purposes of the Fair Work Act as it did not provide for adequate protection for employees' rights and entitlements.
The Commission did not approve the agreement, finding that it did not meet the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission noted that the agreement could be improved by including a dispute resolution process and providing for adequate protection of employees' rights and entitlements.
The Commission's decision was that the application for approval of the agreement be dismissed. The Commission also noted that the parties could revisit the agreement once it had been amended to address the issues identified by the Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.