Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Strand Estates Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2015] NSWLEC 1373 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 10 September 2015 Date of orders: 10 September 2015 Decision date: 10 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O’Neill C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Strand Estates Pty Ltd (Applicant)
North Sydney Council (Respondent)Representation: Mr G. Green, Solicitor (Applicant)
Solicitors:
Mr M. Pearce, Solicitor (Respondent)
Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Applicant)
North Sydney Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 10010 of 2015
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.
…………….
Susan O’Neill
Commissioner
10010 of 2015 O'Neill (O) (7.19 KB, pdf)
10010 of 2015 O'Neill (C) (15.1 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Strand Estates Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2015] NSWLEC 1373
- Case
- [2015] NSWLEC 1373
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court began by examining the procedural fairness of the approval process, considering whether all necessary notices and opportunities for public comment were provided. It found that the Council had followed the necessary statutory requirements and that there were no procedural defects. The court then assessed whether the approval was unreasonable, taking into account the statutory criteria and relevant planning policies. The court concluded that the approval was reasonable, as it aligned with the relevant planning policies and did not contravene any statutory criteria.
In reaching its decision, the court emphasised the importance of procedural fairness in planning approvals and noted that the Council had adhered to the required procedures. The court also highlighted the discretionary nature of the approval process and the deference owed to the Council's decision-making authority. Based on these considerations, the court found that the approval was valid and dismissed the application.
The court's final orders were that the appeal be dismissed, with Strand Estates Pty Ltd to pay the Council's costs of the proceeding. The court's decision underscored the importance of following statutory procedures in planning approvals and the limits of judicial review in such matters.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.