Strahan and Strahan (No. 2)
Case
•
[2008] FamCA 489
•25 March 2008
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Strahan and Strahan (No. 2) [2008] FamCA 489
[2008] FamCA 489
25 March 2008
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter came before Strickland J concerning property settlement and child issues between the parties, identified as Strahan and Strahan.
The court was required to determine several procedural and substantive matters relating to the property settlement, including the filing of affidavits, the dismissal of applications, the provision of information to a single expert witness, and the attendance of parties and witnesses at future hearings. The court also addressed the dismissal of a subpoena issued to D Pty Ltd and an application filed by D Pty Ltd.
Strickland J made a series of orders by consent and otherwise. These included directions for the filing and service of affidavits, the dismissal of the husband's application in a case, and orders for the husband to detail documents he was unable to provide to the single expert witness. The court also dismissed a subpoena issued to D Pty Ltd and an application filed by D Pty Ltd. Further consideration of property settlement and child issues was adjourned to a later date, with provisions for telephone attendance. Costs in relation to subpoenas for D Pty Ltd and H Pty Ltd were to be agreed or taxed.
The court was required to determine several procedural and substantive matters relating to the property settlement, including the filing of affidavits, the dismissal of applications, the provision of information to a single expert witness, and the attendance of parties and witnesses at future hearings. The court also addressed the dismissal of a subpoena issued to D Pty Ltd and an application filed by D Pty Ltd.
Strickland J made a series of orders by consent and otherwise. These included directions for the filing and service of affidavits, the dismissal of the husband's application in a case, and orders for the husband to detail documents he was unable to provide to the single expert witness. The court also dismissed a subpoena issued to D Pty Ltd and an application filed by D Pty Ltd. Further consideration of property settlement and child issues was adjourned to a later date, with provisions for telephone attendance. Costs in relation to subpoenas for D Pty Ltd and H Pty Ltd were to be agreed or taxed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Consent
-
Costs
-
Stay of Proceedings
-
Discovery
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0