Stokes and Stokes
Case
•
[2009] FamCA 639
•1 July 2009
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Stokes and Stokes [2009] FamCA 639
[2009] FamCA 639
1 July 2009
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Stokes and Stokes*, heard by Jordan J, the dispute concerned an application by the Mother alleging contravention of a parenting order.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the Mother had established, on the balance of probabilities, that the Father had contravened the existing parenting order.
His Honour considered the evidence presented by both parties in relation to the alleged contraventions. After reviewing the submissions and the relevant provisions of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth), Jordan J found that the Mother had not discharged her onus of proof. Consequently, the court dismissed the Contravention Application.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the Mother had established, on the balance of probabilities, that the Father had contravened the existing parenting order.
His Honour considered the evidence presented by both parties in relation to the alleged contraventions. After reviewing the submissions and the relevant provisions of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth), Jordan J found that the Mother had not discharged her onus of proof. Consequently, the court dismissed the Contravention Application.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Stokes and Stokes [2009] FamCA 639
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0