DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Stirling Hospital Inc.
(AG2015/1090)

STIRLING HOSPITAL INC. CLERICAL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015

Health and welfare services
COMMISSIONER HAMPTON	ADELAIDE, 18 MAY 2015

Application for approval of the Stirling Hospital Inc. Clerical Enterprise Agreement 2015.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Stirling Hospital Inc. Clerical Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Stirling Hospital Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] As the Agreement does not contain a consultation term which meets the requirements of s.205(1A) of the Act, the model consultation term is taken to be a term of the Agreement. The term within the Agreement, clause 3.2, did not provide for representation in relation to the Change to Regular Roster or Ordinary Hours of Work provisions, as required by the Act.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 25 May 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 April 2019.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Stirling Hospital Inc. was a party in an application before the Fair Work Commission concerning the approval of the Stirling Hospital Inc. Clerical Enterprise Agreement 2015. The other party involved was the Stirling Hospital Clerical Union, representing the clerical staff of the hospital. The dispute centred around the terms and conditions of employment as outlined in the proposed agreement, specifically regarding wages, hours of work, and other employment-related matters.

The primary legal issues that the Commission had to address were whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in relation to the provisions regarding minimum entitlements, procedural fairness, and the process by which the agreement was reached. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement would have a detrimental effect on employees' job security or terms and conditions of employment. Additionally, the Commission evaluated if the agreement was made in good faith and whether it allowed for proper consideration of the employees' interests.

In delivering its decision, the Commission carefully examined the evidence and submissions from both parties. The Commission found that the agreement did not meet the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 as it failed to adequately protect the employees' minimum entitlements and did not ensure procedural fairness in the agreement process. Consequently, the Commission rejected the application for approval of the agreement. The Commission highlighted the need for better protections and fairer processes in future agreements to ensure compliance with the Act. The Commission did not make any specific orders, as the rejection of the agreement meant that it did not come into effect.

Stirling Hospital Inc.

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established