Stewart and Stewart
Case
•
[2014] FCCA 2539
•6 November 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Stewart and Stewart [2014] FCCA 2539
[2014] FCCA 2539
6 November 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Stewart and Stewart*, Judge Coker of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia considered a dispute between a husband and wife concerning the division of their property and superannuation interests. The proceedings involved an application for orders relating to the division of assets, including a specific superannuation fund.
The court was required to determine how to allocate the parties' respective property, including a significant superannuation interest held by the husband. Central to the determination was the application of provisions within the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) concerning the division of superannuation interests in accordance with the relevant regulations.
Judge Coker applied sections 90MT(4) and 90MT(1)(a) of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) to effect a division of the husband's superannuation. The court ordered that a base amount of $147,525.00 of the superannuation account be allocated to the wife. Furthermore, the court created an entitlement for the wife to be paid this amount, with a corresponding reduction in the husband's entitlement, and stipulated the operative time for this payment split. The court also made orders for the execution of necessary documents and appointed the Registrar to act in the event of default, with the husband ordered to pay the wife's costs, to be included in the superannuation split.
The court was required to determine how to allocate the parties' respective property, including a significant superannuation interest held by the husband. Central to the determination was the application of provisions within the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) concerning the division of superannuation interests in accordance with the relevant regulations.
Judge Coker applied sections 90MT(4) and 90MT(1)(a) of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) to effect a division of the husband's superannuation. The court ordered that a base amount of $147,525.00 of the superannuation account be allocated to the wife. Furthermore, the court created an entitlement for the wife to be paid this amount, with a corresponding reduction in the husband's entitlement, and stipulated the operative time for this payment split. The court also made orders for the execution of necessary documents and appointed the Registrar to act in the event of default, with the husband ordered to pay the wife's costs, to be included in the superannuation split.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Stewart and Stewart [2014] FCCA 2539
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
3
PT Bayan Resources TBK v BCBC Singapore Pte Ltd
[2015] HCA 36