Steelfab Unit Trust T/A Pacific Industrial Company

Case [2024] FWCA 3955


[2024] FWCA 3955

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Steelfab Unit Trust T/A Pacific Industrial Company

(AG2024/3971)

PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL COMPANY RESOURCES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024

Building, metal and civil construction industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT O’KEEFFE

PERTH, 12 NOVEMBER 2024

Application for approval of the Pacific Industrial Company Resources Enterprise Agreement 2024

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Pacific Industrial Company Resources Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Steelfab Unit Trust T/A Pacific Industrial Company (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth) (Amending Act) made a number of changes to enterprise agreement approval processes in Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act, that commenced operation on 6 June 2023. The notification time for the Agreement under s.173(2) was 15 August 2024 and the Agreement was made on 9 October 2024. Accordingly, both the genuine agreement and the better off overall test requirements are those applying on and from 6 June 2023.

  2. The Applicant expressed the view that the Agreement passes the Better Off Overall Test (BOOT) and provided a summary of why it expressed this view. Consistent with s.193A(3) of the Act I have given consideration to this view when determining whether the Agreement passes the BOOT.

  3. The Applicant has provided written undertakings (Annexure A). I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

  4. During the process of considering the application a potential concern was identified with respect to the dates of issue of the NERR. The Applicant has provided an explanation of this process and I am satisfied that the process of issuing the NERR complied with the requirements of the Act.

  1. The flexibility term contained in the Agreement was not consistent with the relevant provision in the Act and as such the model flexibility term is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. A concern was identified with respect to pay for apprentices engaged under the Agreement.  However, the Applicant has clarified the statement it made in the Form F17 with respect to apprentices and confirmed that no apprentices will be engaged under the terms of the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 19 November 2024. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 12 November 2028.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE526737  PR781181>

Annexure A:

Details
AGLC
Steelfab Unit Trust T/A Pacific Industrial Company [2024] FWCA 3955
Case
[2024] FWCA 3955
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Steelfab Unit Trust, trading as the Pacific Industrial Company, applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Pacific Industrial Company Resources Enterprise Agreement 2024. The application involved a dispute over the terms and conditions of employment for workers within the resources industry, specifically those employed by the Pacific Industrial Company. The application was heard by the Fair Work Commission, which has the jurisdiction to approve enterprise agreements under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act. This involved an examination of whether the agreement provided for minimum terms and conditions, including minimum wages, leave entitlements, and other employment standards, and whether the agreement had been fairly negotiated and was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission also needed to assess whether the agreement included appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms and adhered to any relevant industry codes of practice.

In delivering its decision, the Fair Work Commission detailed its analysis of the proposed agreement's provisions against the legislative criteria. The Commission noted that the agreement met the minimum standards set out in the Act and included appropriate dispute resolution processes. Furthermore, the Commission was satisfied that the agreement had been fairly negotiated, with evidence provided to support this claim. The Commission concluded that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and approved the enterprise agreement as required by the Fair Work Act. The Commission's decision was based on the thorough examination of the agreement's contents and the evidence provided, ensuring compliance with all statutory requirements.

The final orders of the Fair Work Commission approved the Pacific Industrial Company Resources Enterprise Agreement 2024, effective from the date of approval. The agreement was to be lodged with the Commission and made available to employees and employers as required by law. The decision provided clarity and certainty for the parties involved, allowing the agreement to come into effect and govern the employment terms for the specified workforce.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.