[2016] FWCA 1124
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 |
| s.185—Enterprise agreement |
| Steel Foundations Limited t/a SFL Piletech |
| (AG2015/7168) |
SFL PILETECH (NSW) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015 - 2019
Building, metal and civil construction industries
| COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 19 FEBRUARY 2016 |
Application for approval of the SFL Piletech (NSW) Enterprise Agreement 2015 - 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the
SFL Piletech (NSW) Enterprise Agreement 2015 - 2019 (the Agreement). The application was
made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Steel
Foundations Limited t/a SFL Piletech. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is
attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment
to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in
substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the
requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have
been met.
[2016] FWCA 1124
[4] The Agreement was approved on 19 February 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will
operate from 26 February 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 19 February
2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE417909 PR577247>
[2016] FWCA 1124
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Steel Foundations Limited [2016] FWCA 1124
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 1124
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commissioner was whether the agreement met the necessary criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act. This included assessing whether the agreement complied with the procedural and substantive requirements set forth in the Act, and whether the undertakings provided by the applicant were sufficient to ensure that no financial detriment would be caused to employees and that no substantial changes would be made to the agreement. The Commissioner's role was to determine if the agreement was fair and met the legal standards for approval.
The Commissioner found that the agreement satisfied all the relevant requirements for approval. The written undertakings provided by the applicant were deemed adequate, and the Commissioner was satisfied that they would not lead to any financial detriment for employees or substantial changes to the agreement. Therefore, the Commissioner approved the agreement, which will operate from 26 February 2016 and expire on 19 February 2020.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.