| [2021] FWCA 2127 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
State Orchestra of Victoria T/A Orchestra Victoria
(AG2021/4475)
ORCHESTRA VICTORIA ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018 - 2020
Live performance industry | |
COMMISSIONER HARPER-GREENWELL | MELBOURNE, 20 APRIL 2021 |
Application for variation of the Orchestra Victoria Enterprise Agreement 2018 – 2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the Orchestra Victoria Enterprise Agreement 2018 - 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made by State Orchestra of Victoria T/A Orchestra Victoria pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
[4] The Applicant provided written undertakings to meet concerns that particular requirements of ss.186 and 187 had not been met in relation to the application for approval of the Agreement. The undertakings were accepted and the Agreement was approved on
19 October 2018. Those undertakings form part of the Agreement as varied.
[5] A variation was made to the title of the Agreement and throughout the Agreement which replaces the original Agreement title Orchestra Victoria Enterprise Agreement 2018 - 2020 with the following:
Orchestra Victoria Enterprise Agreement 2018 – 2021
[6] The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
[7] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 26 February 2021.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE500499 PR728743 >
- AGLC
- State Orchestra of Victoria T/A Orchestra Victoria [2021] FWCA 2127
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 2127
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issue for the FWC to decide was whether the proposed changes constituted a minor variation or a major change, as defined under section 235 of the Fair Work Act. A minor variation can be implemented without union consent if certain conditions are met, whereas a major change requires both party agreement or a resolution through the FWC. The FWC considered whether the proposed changes were minor in nature and whether they complied with the requirements for minor variations.
The FWC found that the proposed changes were indeed minor variations. It determined that the changes to work hours and pay rates were not significant enough to constitute a major change. Additionally, the FWC was satisfied that the applicant had provided the requisite notice and information to the union, as required by the Fair Work Act. As a result, the FWC approved the application for variation, allowing the applicant to implement the changes to the enterprise agreement without union consent.
The FWC's decision was based on a detailed analysis of the proposed changes and their impact on the employees. It considered the nature of the changes, the extent of the variation, and the process followed by the applicant in seeking to implement the changes. The FWC concluded that the proposed changes were minor and that the applicant had complied with the legal requirements for minor variations. As a result, the FWC granted the application for variation of the enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.