State of NSW v Guider
Case
•
[2019] NSWSC 646
•04 June 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
State of NSW v Guider [2019] NSWSC 646
[2019] NSWSC 646
04 June 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the case of the State of New South Wales v Guider, the defendant, who had been convicted of manslaughter and was considered a compulsive child sex offender, applied for an interim detention order (IDO) and mandatory psychiatric and psychological examinations. The application was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The court was required to determine whether the defendant had overcome his sexual attraction to children, and if the paramount consideration in granting an IDO was the safety of the community in accordance with section 18A of the Crimes (High Risk Offender) Act 2006 (NSW). The court also had to consider the significance of the defendant's denial of the unlawful killing in the context of the application for an IDO.
The court found that the defendant had not overcome his sexual attraction to children, which was a significant factor in granting an IDO. The court emphasised that the safety of the community was the paramount consideration when deciding on an IDO under section 18A of the Crimes (High Risk Offender) Act 2006 (NSW). The court also noted the significance of the defendant's denial of the unlawful killing in the context of the application for an IDO. Given these factors, the court granted both the application for an IDO and the application for mandatory psychiatric and psychological examinations. The court was satisfied that the defendant's risk to the community warranted these measures.
The final orders of the court included granting the application for an interim detention order, which allowed the defendant to be detained until the sentencing hearing, and also granted the application for mandatory psychiatric and psychological examinations to be carried out. These orders were made in light of the defendant's history as a compulsive child sex offender and his denial of the unlawful killing, which the court deemed significant in determining the appropriate measures to ensure community safety.
The court found that the defendant had not overcome his sexual attraction to children, which was a significant factor in granting an IDO. The court emphasised that the safety of the community was the paramount consideration when deciding on an IDO under section 18A of the Crimes (High Risk Offender) Act 2006 (NSW). The court also noted the significance of the defendant's denial of the unlawful killing in the context of the application for an IDO. Given these factors, the court granted both the application for an IDO and the application for mandatory psychiatric and psychological examinations. The court was satisfied that the defendant's risk to the community warranted these measures.
The final orders of the court included granting the application for an interim detention order, which allowed the defendant to be detained until the sentencing hearing, and also granted the application for mandatory psychiatric and psychological examinations to be carried out. These orders were made in light of the defendant's history as a compulsive child sex offender and his denial of the unlawful killing, which the court deemed significant in determining the appropriate measures to ensure community safety.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
High Risk Offender
-
Mandatory Examinations
-
Community Safety
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
State of NSW v Guider [2019] NSWSC 646
Most Recent Citation
State of NSW v Guider (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 209
Cases Citing This Decision
10
State of NSW v Guider (No 3)
[2020] NSWSC 209
State of New South Wales v Love (Preliminary)
[2019] NSWSC 1660
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
1
Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v Winters
[2007] NSWSC 611
State of New South Wales v Sturgeon
[2019] NSWSC 559
Attorney General for New South Wales v Tillman
[2007] NSWCA 119