State of NSW v Bastian
Case
•
[2011] NSWSC 641
•29 June 2011
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
State of NSW v Bastian [2011] NSWSC 641
[2011] NSWSC 641
29 June 2011
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The State of New South Wales brought an application against Bastian, a convicted offender, under the provisions of the Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006. The application sought an extended supervision order for Bastian, who had previously been convicted of a serious sex offence. The nature of the dispute centred on whether Bastian posed an ongoing risk to the community if not subjected to extended supervision. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether Bastian's risk of reoffending warranted the imposition of an extended supervision order. The court had to determine if there was a high degree of probability that Bastian would commit a serious sex offence if not supervised, as required by the statutory criteria. Additionally, the court needed to assess whether the imposition of an extended supervision order was necessary for the safety of the community.
The court analysed the statutory provisions and considered expert evidence regarding Bastian's risk of reoffending. It found that there was a high degree of probability that Bastian would commit a serious sex offence if not supervised. The court concluded that the safety of the community required the imposition of an extended supervision order. The court accepted that the risk was not only significant but also unacceptable, thereby warranting the extended supervision. The court thus granted the application and made an extended supervision order for Bastian.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether Bastian's risk of reoffending warranted the imposition of an extended supervision order. The court had to determine if there was a high degree of probability that Bastian would commit a serious sex offence if not supervised, as required by the statutory criteria. Additionally, the court needed to assess whether the imposition of an extended supervision order was necessary for the safety of the community.
The court analysed the statutory provisions and considered expert evidence regarding Bastian's risk of reoffending. It found that there was a high degree of probability that Bastian would commit a serious sex offence if not supervised. The court concluded that the safety of the community required the imposition of an extended supervision order. The court accepted that the risk was not only significant but also unacceptable, thereby warranting the extended supervision. The court thus granted the application and made an extended supervision order for Bastian.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Sentencing
-
Extended Supervision Order
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
State of NSW v Bastian [2011] NSWSC 641
Most Recent Citation
Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v Steadman [2013] NSWSC 170
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v Steadman
[2013] NSWSC 170
State of New South Wales v Conway
[2011] NSWSC 976
State of New South Wales v Scerri
[2011] NSWSC 683
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
4
State of New South Wales v Richardson (No 2)
[2011] NSWSC 276
Attorney-General for New South Wales v Gallagher
[2006] NSWSC 420
Attorney General for New South Wales v Tillman
[2007] NSWCA 119