State of New South Wales v Stone (Final)

The State of New South Wales sought an extended supervision order (ESO) against Mr Stone, a high-risk offender, under the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW). The NSW Supreme Court presided over the matter, with the ESO not opposed by Mr Stone. The central legal issues revolved around determining the appropriate duration of the ESO and the specific conditions that should be imposed as part of the order.

The court considered various factors, including Mr Stone's criminal history, the nature and seriousness of his offences, and the risk he posed to the community. The court also took into account the recommendations of the Corrective Services Commissioner and the views of the Victims of Crime Assistance Commissioner. After a thorough analysis, the court determined that an ESO for a duration of five years was appropriate, along with several specific conditions to be imposed as part of the order. These conditions included restrictions on Mr Stone's movements, communication, and associations, as well as requirements for regular reporting to the police and compliance with a curfew.

In summary, the court granted an extended supervision order for a period of five years with specified conditions, finding that this was necessary to protect the community and manage the risk posed by Mr Stone. The decision did not raise any points of principle that required further consideration by higher courts. The final orders included the imposition of the ESO for the specified duration and conditions, which Mr Stone was required to comply with during the period of the order.