State of New South Wales v McCarthy
Case
•
[2015] NSWCA 153
•03 June 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
State of New South Wales v McCarthy [2015] NSWCA 153
[2015] NSWCA 153
03 June 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The State of New South Wales appealed to the Court of Appeal of New South Wales against a District Court decision that found police officers had committed trespass to land. The dispute arose when four police officers entered the respondent's property without his consent, relying on provisions of the *Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002* (NSW) to justify their entry.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the trial judge erred in failing to find that the police officers had reasonable grounds to believe it was necessary to enter the premises immediately to prevent imminent and significant physical injury, as required by section 9(1) of the Act, or that they had reasonable grounds to believe the person they sought to arrest was inside the premises, as required by section 10(2) of the Act. A further issue concerned whether the lawful exercise of powers under sections 9 or 10 was conditional on later compliance with section 201(1) of the Act, which mandates the provision of information to the person subject to the exercise of a power, where it was not practicable to provide such information at the time of entry.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, setting aside the verdict and judgment of the District Court. The Court ordered that the State of New South Wales pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the trial judge erred in failing to find that the police officers had reasonable grounds to believe it was necessary to enter the premises immediately to prevent imminent and significant physical injury, as required by section 9(1) of the Act, or that they had reasonable grounds to believe the person they sought to arrest was inside the premises, as required by section 10(2) of the Act. A further issue concerned whether the lawful exercise of powers under sections 9 or 10 was conditional on later compliance with section 201(1) of the Act, which mandates the provision of information to the person subject to the exercise of a power, where it was not practicable to provide such information at the time of entry.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, setting aside the verdict and judgment of the District Court. The Court ordered that the State of New South Wales pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Negligence & Tort
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Duty of Care
-
Jurisdiction
-
Standing
-
Statutory Construction
-
Appeal
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
R v Gallagher [2015] NSWCCA 228
Cases Citing This Decision
14
Wang v State of New South Wales
[2019] NSWCA 263
John Edward Thornton v State of New South Wales
[2017] NSWCA 248
State of New South Wales v Smith
[2017] NSWCA 194
Cases Cited
11
Statutory Material Cited
8
Paul James McCarthy v State of New South Wales
[2013] NSWDC 247
Halliday v Nevill
[1984] HCA 80
Kuru v State of New South Wales
[2008] HCA 26