State of New South Wales v Haines (Final)
Case
•
[2023] NSWSC 1202
•13 October 2023
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
State of New South Wales v Haines (Final) [2023] NSWSC 1202
[2023] NSWSC 1202
13 October 2023
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Supreme Court of New South Wales, the State of New South Wales sought an extended supervision order against Haines, a 58-year-old woman with a moderate intellectual disability and schizo-affective disorder. The application was made under section 9 of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) to address the unacceptable risk posed by Haines to the community. The defendant had a history of drug use and violent offending, including murder, and had exhibited hostile and unpredictable behaviour while incarcerated and on conditional liberty. The court was tasked with determining whether the criteria for an extended supervision order were met.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the criteria outlined in section 9 of the Act were satisfied. Specifically, the court had to consider whether Haines posed an unacceptable risk of committing serious violence offences, and whether an extended supervision order was necessary to protect the community. The court also had to evaluate the impact of Haines' intellectual disability and mental health condition on her risk profile and the appropriate measures to manage that risk. The court needed to balance the need for community protection with the rights and needs of the individual.
In delivering its decision, the court found that the criteria for an extended supervision order were indeed met. The court noted Haines' extensive history of violent offending, her unpredictable and hostile behaviour, and the risk she posed to the community. The court emphasised that the moderate intellectual disability and schizo-affective disorder did not negate the seriousness of her past conduct and the risk she continued to present. The court concluded that an extended supervision order was necessary to mitigate the risk of serious violence offences and protect the community. The court acknowledged the importance of individualised management plans but determined that an extended supervision order was the most appropriate measure in this case.
The court issued an extended supervision order under section 9 of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW). The order mandates a comprehensive management plan to be overseen by the Corrective Services Commissioner, aimed at mitigating the risk posed by Haines and ensuring her continued supervision to protect the community. The order also includes provisions for periodic reviews to assess the effectiveness of the management plan and the ongoing risk posed by Haines.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the criteria outlined in section 9 of the Act were satisfied. Specifically, the court had to consider whether Haines posed an unacceptable risk of committing serious violence offences, and whether an extended supervision order was necessary to protect the community. The court also had to evaluate the impact of Haines' intellectual disability and mental health condition on her risk profile and the appropriate measures to manage that risk. The court needed to balance the need for community protection with the rights and needs of the individual.
In delivering its decision, the court found that the criteria for an extended supervision order were indeed met. The court noted Haines' extensive history of violent offending, her unpredictable and hostile behaviour, and the risk she posed to the community. The court emphasised that the moderate intellectual disability and schizo-affective disorder did not negate the seriousness of her past conduct and the risk she continued to present. The court concluded that an extended supervision order was necessary to mitigate the risk of serious violence offences and protect the community. The court acknowledged the importance of individualised management plans but determined that an extended supervision order was the most appropriate measure in this case.
The court issued an extended supervision order under section 9 of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW). The order mandates a comprehensive management plan to be overseen by the Corrective Services Commissioner, aimed at mitigating the risk posed by Haines and ensuring her continued supervision to protect the community. The order also includes provisions for periodic reviews to assess the effectiveness of the management plan and the ongoing risk posed by Haines.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Mens Rea & Intention
-
High Risk Offender
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
5
R v Brenda Haines
[2015] NSWSC 390
Haines v R
[2016] NSWCCA 90
State of New South Wales v Tina Lee (a pseudonym) (Preliminary)
[2023] NSWSC 693