State of New South Wales v Butterfield (Preliminary)
Case
•
[2023] NSWSC 1377
•14 November 2023
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
State of New South Wales v Butterfield (Preliminary) [2023] NSWSC 1377
[2023] NSWSC 1377
14 November 2023
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case involved the State of New South Wales seeking an interim detention order for the defendant, Butterfield, who had been charged with serious violence offences. The application was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The state sought the order under the Serious Violent Offenders (Detention and Monitoring) Act 2018, asserting that Butterfield posed a significant risk of serious violence to the community if not detained. The application for an interim detention order was not opposed by Butterfield.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the supporting material presented by the state would, if proved, justify the making of a continuing detention order. This required the court to assess the risk posed by Butterfield based on the evidence provided. The court needed to determine if there was a sufficient likelihood that Butterfield would engage in serious violence if released, warranting his detention under the Act.
The court carefully considered the material presented by the state, including expert evidence and Butterfield's criminal history. The evidence demonstrated a pattern of serious violence and a high risk of reoffending. The court concluded that the material was sufficient to justify the making of a continuing detention order if the case proceeded to a final hearing. Given the uncontested nature of the application, the court granted the interim detention order, ensuring Butterfield's detention pending the outcome of the proceedings. The court ordered that Butterfield be detained until the final determination of the application for a continuing detention order.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the supporting material presented by the state would, if proved, justify the making of a continuing detention order. This required the court to assess the risk posed by Butterfield based on the evidence provided. The court needed to determine if there was a sufficient likelihood that Butterfield would engage in serious violence if released, warranting his detention under the Act.
The court carefully considered the material presented by the state, including expert evidence and Butterfield's criminal history. The evidence demonstrated a pattern of serious violence and a high risk of reoffending. The court concluded that the material was sufficient to justify the making of a continuing detention order if the case proceeded to a final hearing. Given the uncontested nature of the application, the court granted the interim detention order, ensuring Butterfield's detention pending the outcome of the proceedings. The court ordered that Butterfield be detained until the final determination of the application for a continuing detention order.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
High Risk Offender
-
Interim Detention Order
-
Serious Violence Offences
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
State of New South Wales v Butterfield [2024] NSWSC 211
Cases Citing This Decision
2
State of New South Wales v Butterfield
[2024] NSWSC 211
State of New South Wales v Butterfield
[2024] NSWSC 211
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
3
State of New South Wales v Butterfield
[2016] NSWSC 925
State of New South Wales v Butterfield
[2021] NSWSC 11
State of New South Wales v Butterfield
[2016] NSWSC 925