State of New South Wales v Brookes (Preliminary)

Case

[2016] NSWSC 1593

10 November 2016


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
State of New South Wales v Brookes (Preliminary) [2016] NSWSC 1593 [2016] NSWSC 1593 10 November 2016

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In this matter, the State of New South Wales applied for an interim supervision order against the respondent, Brookes, who is a sex offender. The application was made under the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), and the proceedings were held in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The respondent did not oppose the application. The court was required to determine whether it was appropriate to make an interim supervision order given the nature of the offence and the risk the respondent posed to the community.

The court considered the statutory criteria outlined in the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) and the circumstances of the case. The primary consideration was the risk that the respondent posed to the community, particularly children, given his history of sexual offences. The court found that the application was not opposed and that the risk to the community warranted the making of an interim supervision order. The court also considered the respondent's compliance with any conditions that would be imposed and found that it was appropriate to grant the order.

The court made an interim supervision order, subject to certain conditions, including regular reporting to the police, not possessing any items that could be used to commit a sexual offence, and not loitering near places where children congregate. The court also ordered that the respondent undergo a psychological assessment and treatment as recommended by the assessing professionals. The final orders were made in accordance with the statutory requirements and the evidence presented to the court.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Criminal Liability

  • High Risk Offender

  • Interim Supervision Order

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

6

Cases Cited

4

Statutory Material Cited

2