State of New South Wales v Azar (Preliminary)
Case
•
[2025] NSWSC 1046
•12 September 2025
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
State of New South Wales v Azar (Preliminary) [2025] NSWSC 1046
[2025] NSWSC 1046
12 September 2025
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The State of New South Wales filed a proceeding against Mr Azar, seeking extended supervision orders under the Crimes (Serious and Organised Crime Control) Act 2005. The application was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The State contended that Mr Azar was a high-risk offender and that it was necessary to impose extended supervision orders to prevent him from committing serious offences. Mr Azar opposed the application, arguing that the supporting documentation did not satisfy the required threshold of proof and that he should not be subjected to the conditions of the order.
The court was required to determine whether the matters contained in the supporting documentation would satisfy it to a high degree of probability that Mr Azar poses an unacceptable risk of committing another serious offence if not kept under supervision under the order. The court was also required to consider the conditions of the proposed order, including the requirement for Mr Azar to be subject to psychiatric or psychological treatment, and whether these conditions were appropriate and necessary. The court considered the evidence presented by the State and Mr Azar, including expert evidence from psychiatrists and psychologists, and the submissions made by both parties.
The court found that the supporting documentation did satisfy it to a high degree of probability that Mr Azar poses an unacceptable risk of committing another serious offence if not kept under supervision under the order. The court was satisfied that the evidence showed that Mr Azar has a history of violent offending, and that there was a significant risk that he would reoffend if not subject to supervision. The court also found that the conditions of the proposed order, including the requirement for Mr Azar to be subject to psychiatric or psychological treatment, were appropriate and necessary. The court rejected Mr Azar's argument that the conditions were oppressive or disproportionate.
The court made an order granting extended supervision orders in relation to Mr Azar, subject to the conditions specified in the order. The order includes a requirement for Mr Azar to be subject to psychiatric or psychological treatment, and to comply with other conditions designed to prevent him from committing serious offences. The court also made an order that the State pay Mr Azar's costs of the proceeding.
The court was required to determine whether the matters contained in the supporting documentation would satisfy it to a high degree of probability that Mr Azar poses an unacceptable risk of committing another serious offence if not kept under supervision under the order. The court was also required to consider the conditions of the proposed order, including the requirement for Mr Azar to be subject to psychiatric or psychological treatment, and whether these conditions were appropriate and necessary. The court considered the evidence presented by the State and Mr Azar, including expert evidence from psychiatrists and psychologists, and the submissions made by both parties.
The court found that the supporting documentation did satisfy it to a high degree of probability that Mr Azar poses an unacceptable risk of committing another serious offence if not kept under supervision under the order. The court was satisfied that the evidence showed that Mr Azar has a history of violent offending, and that there was a significant risk that he would reoffend if not subject to supervision. The court also found that the conditions of the proposed order, including the requirement for Mr Azar to be subject to psychiatric or psychological treatment, were appropriate and necessary. The court rejected Mr Azar's argument that the conditions were oppressive or disproportionate.
The court made an order granting extended supervision orders in relation to Mr Azar, subject to the conditions specified in the order. The order includes a requirement for Mr Azar to be subject to psychiatric or psychological treatment, and to comply with other conditions designed to prevent him from committing serious offences. The court also made an order that the State pay Mr Azar's costs of the proceeding.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Extended Supervision Orders
-
Risk Assessment
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
1
Attorney General for New South Wales v Tillman
[2007] NSWCA 119
R v Kaddour; R v Azar
[2017] NSWSC 586
State of New South Wales v Azar (Final)
[2021] NSWSC 216