Stankovic v Namul Pty Ltd

The appeal concerned an application by the appellant, Stankovic, against Namul Pty Ltd. The nature of the dispute and the specific relief sought by the appellant in the primary proceedings are not detailed, but the appeal itself arose from the refusal of interlocutory relief by the primary court. The matter was heard by Macfarlan JA in the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.

The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the primary court had erred in refusing to grant the interlocutory relief sought by the appellant. The catchwords indicate that the appeal did not raise any significant issue of principle, suggesting the focus was on the application of established legal tests to the facts of the case.

Macfarlan JA dismissed the appeal, finding no error in the primary court's decision. The reasoning, though not elaborated in the provided text, appears to have been that the refusal of interlocutory relief was a correct exercise of discretion by the primary judge, and no substantial question of law or principle was raised that warranted appellate intervention. The court applied the principles governing the grant of interlocutory relief and the standard of review for discretionary decisions.

Consequently, the appellant's Notice of Motion was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the respondent.