Stankovic v Namul Pty Ltd (No 2)
Case
•
[2013] NSWCA 260
•08 August 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Stankovic v Namul Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 260
[2013] NSWCA 260
08 August 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Stankovic v Namul Pty Ltd (No 2)*, the applicant sought a stay of proceedings and referral for pro bono assistance. The matter came before Macfarlan JA in the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant a stay of proceedings and a referral for pro bono assistance. The Court was required to consider the applicant's arguments in support of these requests and determine if they met the necessary legal threshold.
Macfarlan JA dismissed the applicant's Notice of Motion. The decision indicates that no issue of principle was raised that would justify the granting of the orders sought. The applicant's application was therefore unsuccessful.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant a stay of proceedings and a referral for pro bono assistance. The Court was required to consider the applicant's arguments in support of these requests and determine if they met the necessary legal threshold.
Macfarlan JA dismissed the applicant's Notice of Motion. The decision indicates that no issue of principle was raised that would justify the granting of the orders sought. The applicant's application was therefore unsuccessful.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Stay of Proceedings
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
The Hills Shire Council v Stankovic [2017] NSWSC 464
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
1
Stankovic v Namul Pty Ltd
[2013] NSWCA 41
Hetherington-Gregory v All Vehicle Services (No 2)
[2012] NSWCA 257
M v Director General, Department of Family and Community Services
[2013] NSWCA 118