| [2017] FWCA 1544 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009
Sch. 3, Item 16 - Application to terminate collective agreement-based transitional instrument
Stankey Electrics Contracting Pty Ltd
(AG2017/432)
STANKEY ELECTRICS CONTRACTING PTY LTD EMPLOYEE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2009/2012
Electrical power industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER | SYDNEY, 17 MARCH 2017 |
Termination of the Stankey Electrics Contracting Pty Ltd Employee Collective Agreement 2009/2012.
[1] On 15 February 2017, Stankey Electrics Contracting Pty Ltd applied to terminate the Stankey Electrics Contracting Pty Ltd Employee Collective Agreement 2009/2012 (the Agreement) under item 16 of schedule 3 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (Cth) (the TPCA Act).
[2] Item 16 of schedule 3 of the TPCA Act provides that Subdivision D of Division 7 of Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) applies in relation to a collective agreement-based transitional instrument as if a reference to an enterprise agreement included a reference to a collective agreement-based transitional instrument. Accordingly, I must terminate the Agreement if I am satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act.
[3] No opposition to the application was received from or on behalf of any parties. Having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated. The termination will come into effect from the date of this decision.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AC324873 PR591085>
- AGLC
- Stankey Electrics Contracting Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 1544
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 1544
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues that the court needed to decide were whether the employer had followed the correct procedures for terminating the collective agreement and if the termination was justified. The union argued that the employer had not followed the necessary processes and that the termination was unjustified. The employer contended that it had followed all required procedures and that the termination was valid due to significant changes in the business environment.
The Fair Work Commission found that the employer had indeed followed the necessary procedures for terminating the collective agreement. The Commission also held that the termination was justified given the substantial changes in the business environment. The union's argument that the employer had acted outside the scope of the agreement was dismissed by the court, which found that the employer had acted within its rights under the Fair Work Act 2009.
The Fair Work Commission upheld the employer's decision to terminate the collective agreement. The union's application for review was dismissed, and the termination was confirmed as lawful.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.