Stacey and Woden

In the matter of Stacey and Woden, Benjamin J of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia considered parenting orders concerning two children, G and D. The dispute involved applications by the parents, which were otherwise dismissed, save for the specific orders made regarding the children's welfare.

The court was required to determine the appropriate parenting orders for G and D, considering the need to protect them from abuse and exposure to pornography. The court also had to consider the role and powers of the Independent Children’s Lawyer appointed for the children.

Benjamin J dismissed all previous parenting orders and made new orders pursuant to section 68B of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). These orders prohibited either parent from abusing the children or placing them at risk of abuse, and from allowing the children to see or be exposed to pornography while in their care. The court also incorporated a Fact Sheet into the orders, detailing the obligations and consequences of contravention, as well as support services available. The Independent Children’s Lawyer's appointment was continued until the children turned eighteen, with specific powers to inform the children of the orders, liaise with schools and medical practitioners, report to State Welfare authorities, and interview the children.