[2013] FWCA 8950 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
St Peter's Woodlands Grammar School Inc
(AG2013/10010)
ST PETER'S WOODLANDS GRAMMAR SCHOOL INC ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Educational services | |
COMMISSIONER STEEL | ADELAIDE, 14 NOVEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the St Peter's Woodlands Grammar School Inc. Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the St Peter's Woodlands Grammar School Inc Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss. 186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Independent Education Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover them. As required by s.201 (2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers that organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54 (1) of the Act it will operate from 21 November 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 14 November 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE405345 PR544533>
- AGLC
- St Peter's Woodlands Grammar School Inc [2013] FWCA 8950
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 8950
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it adhered to the procedural requirements of the Fair Work Act. Additionally, the court had to assess if the terms of the agreement were fair and reasonable, taking into account the interests of both employees and the employer. The Commission examined the process by which the agreement was negotiated and whether all procedural steps were properly followed. The court also considered the content of the agreement, evaluating whether it provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees, including pay rates, conditions of employment, and other relevant matters.
The Fair Work Commission found that the application for approval of the enterprise agreement was made in good faith and that all procedural requirements were complied with. The Commission also determined that the terms of the agreement were fair and reasonable, considering the interests of both the employees and the employer. The Commission approved the agreement, noting that it provided a balanced approach that recognised the needs and rights of both parties. The decision highlighted the importance of procedural fairness and the necessity for agreements to be reasonable in their terms.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.