| [2014] FWC 5302 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
St John of God Health Care Inc T/A St John of God Hospital Burwood
(AG2014/1644)
ST JOHN OF GOD HEALTHCARE NSW HOSPITALS AND NEW SOUTH WALES NURSES AND MIDWIVES’ ASSOCIATION / ANMF- NSW BRANCH, NURSES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Health and welfare services
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOOTH | SYDNEY, 5 AUGUST 2014 |
St John of God Healthcare NSW Hospitals and New South Wales Nurses and Midwives’ Association / ANMF - NSW Branch, Nurses Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the St John of God Healthcare NSW Hospitals and New South Wales Nurses and Midwives’ Association / ANMF - NSW Branch, Nurses Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by St John of God Health Care Inc T/A St John of God Hospital Burwood. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The New South Wales Nurses and Midwives’ Association and the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation, New South Wales Branch, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 12 August 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
DEPUTY PRESIDENTPrinted by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE409454 PR553922>
- AGLC
- ST JOHN OF GOD HEALTHCARE NSW HOSPITALS AND NEW SOUTH WALES NURSES AND MIDWIVES’ ASSOCIATION / ANMF- NSW BRANCH, NURSES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014 [2014] FWC 5302
- Case
- [2014] FWC 5302
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue for the Commission to resolve was whether the hospital had complied with the agreed procedures for rostering and shift allocation as stipulated in the enterprise agreement. The Association argued that the hospital had deviated from the agreed processes, resulting in rosters that did not fairly reflect the agreed shift patterns and entitlements. The hospital, on the other hand, contended that its rostering practices were consistent with the agreement and were necessary to meet the operational needs of the hospital.
The Commission examined the terms of the enterprise agreement and the evidence presented by both parties. It found that while the hospital had some flexibility in its rostering practices, it had not followed the agreed procedures as required by the agreement. The Commission concluded that the hospital's practices had not only deviated from the agreed processes but had also resulted in rosters that unfairly disadvantaged some nurses. Consequently, the Commission ruled that the hospital had breached the enterprise agreement. The Commission ordered the hospital to rectify its rostering practices to ensure compliance with the agreement and to provide affected nurses with appropriate compensation for the breaches.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.