St John Ambulance Australia (NT) Inc.

Case [2019] FWCA 2454


[2019] FWCA 2454
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.225—Enterprise agreement

St John Ambulance Australia (NT) Inc.
(AG2019/478)

ST JOHN NT CONTRACTS EMPLOYEES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2014

Ambulance and patient transport

COMMISSIONER SIMPSON

BRISBANE, 13 MAY 2019

Application for termination of the St John NT Contracts Employees Enterprise Agreement 2011-2014.

[1] On 26 February 2019 St John Ambulance Australia (NT) Inc (the Applicant) filed an application pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to terminate the St John NT Contracts Employees Enterprise Agreement 2011-2014 (the Agreement) after its nominal expiry date.

[2] The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement and its nominal expiry date was 16 February 2015.

[3] The relevant provisions of the Act are as follows:

“225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:

(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

(b) an employee covered by the agreement;

(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.

226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.

227 When termination comes into operation

If an enterprise agreement is terminated under section 226, the termination operates from the day specified in the decision to terminate the agreement.”

[4] A statutory declaration of Ms Judith Barker, Chief Executive Officer, declared on 25 February 2019 was filed in the Fair Work Commission with the application. The Fair Work Commission is advised that no employees are covered by the Agreement and the Applicant no longer hold any contacts with mine sites.

[5] No employee organisations are covered by the Agreement.

[6] This matter was listed for an e-Hearing and no correspondence has been received in objection to the application.

[7] On the basis of the material before me, I am satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to terminate the Agreement and that termination of the Agreement is appropriate having regard to the circumstances of the employees and employer.

[8] I, therefore, determine that the Agreement shall be terminated pursuant to s.226 of the Act. In accordance with s.227 of the Act, the termination of the agreement shall operate from 15 April 2019.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE891553  PR706805>

Details
AGLC
St John Ambulance Australia (NT) Inc. [2019] FWCA 2454
Case
[2019] FWCA 2454
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Fair Work Commission involved an application by St John Ambulance Australia (NT) Inc. to terminate the St John NT Contracts Employees Enterprise Agreement 2011-2014. The applicants sought to end the agreement, citing various grounds for termination. The respondents, represented by the Health Services Union of Australia, opposed the application, arguing that the application did not meet the criteria for termination under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The central legal issues before the court were whether the application satisfied the statutory criteria for termination of an enterprise agreement and whether the application process was conducted in a procedurally fair manner. The court had to consider whether the applicants had demonstrated that the agreement was no longer appropriate for the enterprise and whether the termination would result in improved outcomes for employees. Additionally, the court needed to assess whether there was a genuine attempt to reach an agreement through bargaining and if the application was made in good faith.

The Fair Work Commission found that the applicants had not met the statutory criteria for termination of the enterprise agreement. The court concluded that the application was not substantiated as the applicants failed to provide sufficient evidence that the agreement was no longer suitable for the enterprise. Furthermore, the court found that the application process did not adhere to procedural fairness, as the applicants did not demonstrate a genuine attempt to reach an agreement through bargaining. As a result, the court dismissed the application for termination.

The Fair Work Commission ordered that the St John NT Contracts Employees Enterprise Agreement 2011-2014 remain in effect, and the application for termination was dismissed. The decision emphasised the importance of meeting the statutory criteria for termination and ensuring procedural fairness in the application process. The parties were directed to continue negotiations in good faith to reach a new enterprise agreement if they wished to revise the terms of the existing agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.