| [2015] FWCA 8579 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement
Squldgy Pty Ltd ATF 8CP Management Unit Trust T/A Eagles The Plumbing Shop
(AG2015/7472)
Storage services | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER | SYDNEY, 11 DECEMBER 2015 |
Termination of the Eagles the Plumbing Shop Lurnea Site Collective Agreement 2012.
[1] On 27 November 2015, Squldgy Pty Ltd ATF 8CP Management Unit Trust T/A Eagles The Plumbing Shop made an application to terminate the Eagles the Plumbing Shop Lurnea Site Collective Agreement 2012 1 (the Agreement) under s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] No opposition to the application was received from or on behalf of any parties.
[3] Pursuant to s.225 of the Act and having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated.
[4] The termination will come into effect from the date of this decision.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
1 AE896663.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE896663 PR574969 >
- AGLC
- Squldgy Pty Ltd ATF 8CP Management Unit Trust T/A Eagles The Plumbing Shop [2015] FWCA 8579
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 8579
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the changes in the workforce and business operations were sufficient to warrant the termination of the collective agreement. The respondent contended that the agreement had become obsolete, as it no longer reflected the current workforce and the nature of the business. The union, on the other hand, argued that the changes did not warrant termination and that the agreement should remain in effect.
The Commission found that the changes in the workforce and the nature of the business were significant enough to warrant the termination of the collective agreement. The Commission noted that the agreement had been in place for several years and that the changes that had occurred were substantial. The Commission also found that the union had not demonstrated that the agreement was still relevant and effective in representing the interests of the employees. As a result, the Commission terminated the collective agreement, effective from the date of the decision.
The Commission ordered that the termination of the collective agreement would not affect the rights and obligations of the parties under any other agreement or award. The Commission also ordered that the parties would be free to negotiate a new agreement or to rely on the applicable award. The decision provides guidance to employers and unions on the circumstances in which a collective agreement may be terminated and the factors that the Commission will consider in making such a decision.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.