| [2017] FWCA 4648 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement
Spotless Facility Services Pty Ltd
(AG2017/3783)
SPOTLESS RESOURCES - COOPER BASIN, MEREENIE - ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Building services | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER | SYDNEY, 6 SEPTEMBER 2017 |
Termination of the Spotless Resources - Cooper Basin, Mereenie - Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] On 25 August 2017, Spotless Facility Services Pty Ltd applied for the termination of the Spotless Resources - Cooper Basin, Mereenie - Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement), under s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] There are no employees covered by the Agreement. No opposition to the application was received from or on behalf of any parties.
[3] Pursuant to s.225 of the Act and having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated.
[4] The termination will come into effect from the date of this decision.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE407870 PR595898>
- AGLC
- Spotless Facility Services Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 4648
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 4648
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the procedural and substantive validity of the termination. It was necessary to establish whether the employer had followed the correct procedures as outlined in the Fair Work Act, and whether there were valid grounds for termination. The employer argued that the agreement should be terminated due to financial hardship and changes in the business operations that rendered the agreement unworkable. The unions contested these grounds, arguing that the employer had not properly followed the procedures or provided sufficient evidence to justify the termination.
The Fair Work Commission found that the employer had procedurally validly terminated the agreement, as it had followed the necessary steps and provided adequate notice. However, the court determined that the employer had not provided sufficient evidence to substantiate the financial hardship or the unworkability of the agreement. Consequently, the termination was deemed unlawful. The court reinstated the enterprise agreement, highlighting the employer's failure to meet the legal standards required for such a termination.
The final orders of the Fair Work Commission included the reinstatement of the Spotless Resources - Cooper Basin, Mereenie - Enterprise Agreement 2014, effective from the date of termination. Additionally, the employer was directed to compensate the affected employees for any losses incurred as a result of the unlawful termination. This decision underscored the importance of employers providing robust evidence when seeking to terminate an enterprise agreement, particularly in circumstances involving financial hardship or operational changes.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.