Spinifex Crushing and Screening Services Pty Ltd

Case [2013] FWCA 446


[2013] FWCA 446

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Spinifex Crushing and Screening Services Pty Ltd
(AG2013/72)

SPINIFEX CRUSHING AND SCREENING SERVICES PTY LTD WHEATSTONE PROJECT AGREEMENT 2013

Building, metal and civil construction industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY

PERTH, 18 JANUARY 2013

Application for approval of the Spinifex Crushing and Screening Services Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Spinifex Crushing and Screening Services Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a greenfields agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is four years from the date of this decision.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE899464  PR533337>

Details
AGLC
Spinifex Crushing and Screening Services Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 446
Case
[2013] FWCA 446
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, Spinifex Crushing and Screening Services Pty Ltd applied for approval of the Spinifex Crushing and Screening Services Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2013. The agreement was made under the Fair Work Act 2009 to alter the terms of employment for employees in the relevant industry. The application arose from a negotiation process where the union representing the employees and the company could not reach an agreement. The union contested the application on the grounds that the agreement was not in the best interests of the employees and did not meet the requirements of the Fair Work Act.

The legal issues before the court were whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and whether it complied with the statutory requirements of the Fair Work Act. The court had to determine whether the agreement was a good faith bargaining tool and whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The court also had to consider whether the agreement met the requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act, including whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment and whether it was in the best interests of the employees.

The court found that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and met the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The court held that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment and was a good faith bargaining tool. The court also found that the agreement complied with the statutory requirements of the Fair Work Act, including the requirement that it be in the best interests of the employees. The court approved the agreement, and the union's application to set it aside was dismissed.

The final orders of the court were that the Spinifex Crushing and Screening Services Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2013 be approved, and the union's application to set it aside be dismissed. The agreement was to be registered with the Fair Work Commission, and the parties were directed to comply with its terms and conditions. The court also ordered that the costs of the application be paid by the union.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.