SP & JD Pty Ltd

Case [2023] FWCA 801


[2023] FWCA 801

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

SP & JD Pty Ltd

(AG2023/545)

Central Communications and Electrical Contractors Queen's Wharf Project Agreement 2022

Electrical contracting industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN

MELBOURNE, 15 MARCH 2023

Application for approval of the Central Communications and Electrical Contractors Queen's Wharf Project Agreement 2022

  1. SP & JD Pty Ltd has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Central Communications and Electrical Contractors Queen’s Wharf Project Agreement 2022 (the Agreement) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval has been met.

  1. The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by 201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the CEPU.

  1. The Agreement was approved on 15 March 2023 and, in accordance with s 54, it will operate from 22 March 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 November 2026.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE519486  PR760288>

Details
AGLC
SP & JD Pty Ltd [2023] FWCA 801
Case
[2023] FWCA 801
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, SP & JD Pty Ltd, sought approval of an agreement to facilitate the Central Communications and Electrical Contractors Queen's Wharf Project. The agreement aimed to regulate the terms and conditions under which electrical and communication work would be conducted at the project site. The matter was heard by the court, which needed to determine the fairness and reasonableness of the agreement's terms. The dispute centred on whether the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of both parties and complied with relevant legislative and contractual obligations.

The court was tasked with examining the terms of the agreement to ensure they were fair, reasonable, and not oppressive to either party. This involved assessing the agreement against statutory standards and common law principles concerning fairness in contracts. The court needed to consider whether the agreement provided adequate protections for the parties involved and if it conformed to the legal requirements set out in the applicable legislation. Additionally, the court had to evaluate whether the agreement was in line with the objectives of the project and did not unduly favour one party over the other.

After careful consideration of the agreement and the legal frameworks governing such contracts, the court found that the terms of the Central Communications and Electrical Contractors Queen's Wharf Project Agreement 2022 were fair and reasonable. The court concluded that the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of both parties and complied with all relevant legal requirements. The terms provided adequate protections and were consistent with the project's objectives. The court approved the agreement, ensuring that the terms would facilitate the smooth and lawful execution of the project.

The court's final orders included the approval of the Central Communications and Electrical Contractors Queen's Wharf Project Agreement 2022, subject to the terms set out in the agreement. The decision enabled the parties to proceed with the project under the terms of the approved agreement, which the court deemed fair, reasonable, and compliant with the law.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.