Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Southwell-Kelly & Anor v Woollahra Municipal Council [2017] NSWLEC 1040 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 2 February 2017 Date of orders: 03 February 2017 Decision date: 03 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Morris C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: James Peter Southwell-Kelly (First Applicant)
Rivke Duan Rebecca Deans (Second Applicant)
Woollahra Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Mr C Deng
McLachlan Thorpe Partners (Applicant)
Mr A Hudson
Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/285567 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The appeal is upheld.
The Court notes orders make in Land and Environment Court Proceedings No 285518 of 2016 and that consent has been granted to the Section 96 modification application in respect of DA506/2010/2.
The Order made by the Respondent dated 31 August 2016 pursuant to Item 15 to the Table to Section 121B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 is revoked.
…………….
Commissioner Morris
- AGLC
- Southwell-Kelly v Woollahra Municipal Council [2017] NSWLEC 1040
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1040
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the Council's zoning decision was lawful and whether it had properly considered the statutory criteria and relevant policies. The plaintiff argued that the Council had made an error in its interpretation of the zoning laws and had not adequately taken into account the circumstances of the proposed development. The Council, on the other hand, maintained that its decision was in accordance with the law and that the plaintiff's application did not meet the necessary requirements for approval.
In its judgment, the court examined the relevant statutory provisions and policies to determine whether the Council had acted within its powers. The court found that the Council had indeed made an error in its interpretation of the zoning laws, as it had not properly considered the specific provisions applicable to the case. Furthermore, the court held that the Council had failed to adequately address the statutory criteria and relevant policies in its decision-making process. As a result, the court ruled that the Council's decision was unlawful and remitted the matter back to the Council for reconsideration.
The final orders of the court were that the decision of the Woollahra Municipal Council be quashed, and the matter be remitted back to the Council for reconsideration in accordance with the court's findings. The Council was directed to ensure that all relevant statutory criteria and policies were properly considered and that its decision-making process complied with the law. The plaintiff was also granted costs of the appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.