Southern Queensland Steel Pty. Ltd.

Case [2021] FWCA 4534


[2021] FWCA 4534
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Southern Queensland Steel Pty. Ltd.
(AG2021/5886)

SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND STEEL 2021 ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT

Building, metal and civil construction industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT ASBURY

BRISBANE, 27 JULY 2021

Application for approval of the Southern Queensland Steel 2021 Enterprise Agreement.

[1] Southern Queensland Steel Pty. Ltd. applies to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Southern Queensland Steel 2021 Enterprise Agreement (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] Undertakings were provided by the Employer in response to concerns the Commission held in relation to the operation of certain clauses and whether the Agreement passes the better off overall test. A copy of the Undertakings is attached as Annexure A to this decision. I am satisfied that the effect of accepting the Undertakings is not likely to:

(a) cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement; or

(b) result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[3] The views of each person or organisation the Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings. Pursuant to subsection 190(3) of the Act, I accept the Undertakings. In accordance with s.201(3) of the Act, a copy of the undertakings will be attached to the Agreement and forms part of the Agreement.

[4] I observe that the following clauses may be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

  Clause 9(ii) – Leave;

  Clause 9(iii) – Leave;

  Clause 9(v) – Leave;

  Clause 10(i) – Annual Leave;

  Clause 10(ii) – Annual Leave;

  Clause 10(iii) – Annual Leave; and

  Clause 12.2(a) – Period of Probation.

[5] However, I note clause 2(iii) of the Agreement provides that where there is an inconsistency between a provision of the Agreement and the NES, and the NES provides a greater benefit, the NES provision will apply to the extent of the inconsistency. On this basis, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES. I also note that by virtue of s. 55 of the Act, an enterprise agreement must not exclude the NES or any provisions of the NES and s. 56 provides that a term of an enterprise agreement has no effect to the extent that it contravenes s. 55.

[6] The Agreement does not contain a consultation term that is consistent with the requirements in s.205 of the Act. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[7] The Agreement does not contain a flexibility term that is consistent with the requirements in s.205 of the Act. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[8] Clause 3 of the Agreement states the Agreement will commence on 1 February 2021. This is inconsistent with s.54 of the Act which states that an enterprise agreement approved by the Commission operates from 7 days after the agreement is approved, or if a later day is specified in the agreement, that later day. Accordingly, the Agreement will operate 7 days from the date of this decision.

[9] I am satisfied, on the basis of information set out in the Form F16 Application for approval of an enterprise agreement, the Form F17 Employer’s declaration in support of an application for approval of the Agreement and responses to requests for further information provided by the Applicant, that each of the requirements of ss. l86, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account s.186(3) and (3A), and on the basis of the information contained in the Form F17, I am satisfied that the group of employees covered by the Agreement was fairly chosen.

[10] The United Workers Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover that organisation. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, and based on the declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.

[11] The Agreement is approved in accordance with s.54 of the Act and will operate from 3 August 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 February 2024.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE512477  PR732200>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Southern Queensland Steel Pty. Ltd. [2021] FWCA 4534
Case
[2021] FWCA 4534
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Southern Queensland Steel Pty. Ltd., sought approval of the Southern Queensland Steel 2021 Enterprise Agreement. The applicant argued that the agreement contained appropriate provisions for its employees, including terms for wages, hours of work, and other conditions of employment. The Fair Work Commission was the tribunal tasked with reviewing and approving the enterprise agreement.

The legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly sections 233 and 234. These sections require that the agreement fairly and properly deals with the employees' terms and conditions of employment. The Commission needed to consider if the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and if it was appropriately certified by an independent certifier.

The Commission found that the agreement did indeed meet the requirements of the Act. The applicant provided evidence that the agreement had been independently certified, and the Commission was satisfied that the terms and conditions of employment were fair and reasonable. The Commission noted that the agreement included provisions for wage increases, a just cause dismissal clause, and provisions for redundancy and retrenchment. The Commission concluded that the agreement was appropriate for approval and met the requirements of the Act.

Accordingly, the Fair Work Commission approved the Southern Queensland Steel 2021 Enterprise Agreement. The approval was made effective from the date of the Commission's decision. The applicant was authorised to implement the terms and conditions of the agreement with its employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.