Southern Queensland Steel Pty. Ltd. T/A Southern Steel Queensland

Case [2024] FWCA 2777


[2024] FWCA 2777

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Southern Queensland Steel Pty. Ltd. T/A Southern Steel Queensland

(AG2024/2495)

SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND STEEL PTY LTD 2024 ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT

Storage services

DEPUTY PRESIDENT DOBSON

BRISBANE, 29 JULY 2024

Application for approval of the Southern Queensland Steel Pty Ltd 2024 Enterprise Agreement

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Southern Queensland Steel Pty Ltd 2024 Enterprise Agreement (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Southern Queensland Steel Pty Ltd T/A Southern Steel Queensland (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) distributed to employees appears to have a different name for the Agreement to that which was eventually made. However, I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor procedural departure from the prescribed form requirements of the NERR under s.174(1A) of the Act and that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(5) of the Act.[1]

  1. The Applicant has provided written undertakings. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

  1. The views of each person who the Fair Work Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings.

  1. Pursuant to s.190(3) of the Act, I accept the undertakings.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, having regard to the Statement of Principles,[2] on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. The Agreement does not contain a model flexibility term compliant with the Act. Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement

  1. The Agreement does not contain a model consultation term compliant with the Act. Pursuant to section 205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

·   Clause 14.3 – Withholding monies at Termination.

·   Clause 29 – Annual Leave (Additional week for shiftworkers as defined).

However, noting clause 2(iii) of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The United Workers Union (UWU) lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration giving notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the UWU.

  1. The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 February 2027.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others[2019] FWCFB 318 [117].

[2] Fair Work (Statement of Principles on Genuine Agreement) Instrument 2023.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE525599  PR777621>

Details
AGLC
Southern Queensland Steel Pty. Ltd. T/A Southern Steel Queensland [2024] FWCA 2777
Case
[2024] FWCA 2777
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Southern Queensland Steel Pty. Ltd., trading as Southern Steel Queensland, applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of their 2024 Enterprise Agreement. The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission, a tribunal established under the Fair Work Act 2009 to manage employment relations disputes. The dispute centred on whether the proposed agreement complied with the statutory requirements for enterprise agreements, including the provisions for employee representation and procedural fairness during the negotiation process.

The key legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement adequately represented the interests of the employees and if the negotiation process followed the necessary procedural steps as outlined in the Fair Work Act. The Commission examined whether the agreement was made in good faith, if it was free from any improper influences, and if it provided for a fair and efficient means of resolving disputes between the employer and the employees. Additionally, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement satisfied the provisions of the Act concerning minimum terms and conditions of employment.

The Commission found that the agreement was negotiated in good faith and was free from any improper influences. It concluded that the agreement adequately represented the interests of the employees and provided for a fair and efficient means of resolving disputes. The negotiation process was deemed to have followed the necessary procedural steps as required by the Act. Furthermore, the Commission determined that the agreement satisfied the minimum terms and conditions of employment stipulated in the Fair Work Act. As a result, the Commission approved the 2024 Enterprise Agreement.

The final orders of the Commission were that the Southern Queensland Steel Pty. Ltd. 2024 Enterprise Agreement be approved, effective from the date of the decision. The agreement was to be registered with the Fair Work Commission, and the parties were directed to comply with the terms of the agreement in their future dealings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.