JUDGMENT No. ........ ........ .. .... .. .... L a 1'773
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
No. NG 216 of 1992
BETWEEN:
SOUTHERN CROSS FOODS PTY. LIMITED
m: COUNTERPOINT MARKETING SERVICES PTY. LIMITED
First Respondent
m: COUNTERPOINT MARKETING SERVICES fVICTORIAl
PTY. LIMITED
Second Respondent
m: COUNTERPOINT MARKETING SERVICES fW.A.) PTY. LIMITED
Third Respondent
. ~. * . -
m: COUNTERPOINT MARKETING SERVICES ITASMANIA) PTY.
LIMITED . .
. .-
Fourth Respondent
m: COUNTERPOINT MARKETING SERVICES IS.A.I PTY. LIMITED
Fifth Respondent
m: COUNTERPOINT MARKETING SERVICES (OLD.) PTY. LIMITED
Sixth Respondent
MINUTES OF ORDER
JUDGE MAKING ORDER: Cooper J .
WHERE WADE: Brisbane DATE OF ORDER: 4 February, 1993 THE COURT ORDERS :-
l.
That judgment be entered against the applicant/ cross-claimant in respect of the cross-clajm f i l e d
- - - - -
- - -
- - - - -
.
by the first, second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth
respondents/cross-applicants on 15 June, 1992 in thesum of $52,000.00.
2. That the applicant/cross-respondent pay the
respondents/cross-claimants' costs of and incidental
to the action and cross claim to be taxed including the costs of and incidental to the notice of motion and the entry of judgment pursuant to this order.
Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in
Order 36 of the?;Federal Court Rules.-I I
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
- QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION
No. NG 216 of 1992
BETWEEN:
SOUTHERN CROSS FOODS PTY. LIMITED
Ap~licant
m: COUNTERPOINT MARKETING SERVICES PTY. LIMITED
First Respondent
m: COUNTERPOINT MARKETING SERVICES (VICTORIA)
PTY. LIMITED
Second Res~ondent
AJQ: COUNTERPOINT MARKETING SERVICES (W.A.) PTY. LIMITED
Third Res~ondent
AJQ: COUNTERPOINT MARKETING SERVICES (TASMANIA) 'PTY. . . LIMITED
Fourth Respondent
AJQ: COUNTERPOINT MARKETING SERVICES (S.A.) PTY. LIMITED
~ifth Respondent
m: COUNTERPOINT MARKETING SERVICES (OLD.) PTY. LIMITED
Sixth Respondent
CORM: Cooper J.
PLACE : Brisbane W: 4 February, 1993
EXTEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
In this matter, on 7 October, 1992 his Honour Mr. Justice Spender made orders in favour of the applicants on the notice of motion whereby it was ordered that Southern Cross Foodds Pty. Limited, the applicant to the principal application and cross-respondent, pay to the respondent/ cross-claimants the sum of $52,000.00 inclusive of costs in full and final satisfaction of the respondent/cross-claimants' claim filed on 15 June, 1992. That sum was to be paid on or before 16 October, 1992.
By the terms of his Honour's order, his Honour provided that if no less than $20,000.00 was paid by 16 October, then the balance unpaid should not fall due for payment until 16 November, 1992 and that the applicant/cross- respondent would be liable to pay interest thereon at the rate of 15 per cent per annum. The respondent/cross-claimants were then at liberty on 16 November, if they had not received the balance due plus interest accrued, to enter judgment for the balance outstanding of the sum of $52,000.00 plus the interest remaining unpaid as at 16 November, plus costs.
His Honour further provided that if an amount of
less than $20,000.00 was paid by 16 October, 1992 the
respondent/cross-claimants were at liberty to enter judgment
forthwith for the sum of $52,000.00 less any amount so paid by the applicant/cross-respondent, together with the costs of and
provided that an affidavit of the solicitors for the incidental to the action to be taxed. His Honour also respondent/cross-claimants as to the non-payment of the monies ordered to be paid would be sufficient proof of non-payment. I have before me two affidavits of Mr. Stitt, the solicitor for the applicants on the notice of motion wherein he deposes that no sums of money have been paid pursuant to the order at all and that remains true as at the date of this
judgment.
In all the circumstances, I am satisfied that the applicants on the notice of motion are entitled to judgment in the sum of $52,000.00. However, I am not satisfied that they are entitled to any interest in terms of the order made by his Honour Mr. Justice Spender.
THE COURT ORDERS :-
l. That judgment be entered against the applicant/ cross-claimant in respect of .the cross-claim filed by the first, second, th~rd, fourth, fifth and sixth
respondents/cross-applicants on 15 June, 1992 in the
sum of $52,000.00.
That the applicant/cross-respondent pay therespondents/cross-claimants' costs of and incidental to the action and cross claim to be taxed including the costs of and incidental to the notice of motion and the entry of judgment pursuant to this order.
preceding pages are a true copy of the I certify that this and the two (2) reasons for judgment herein of the
Honourable Mr. Justice Cooper.Date: 22 February, 1993.
L I l l ,,\, , < L L L I L L Z Associate
Solicitors for the Applicant: Mr. D. Stitt of Jones & Co. Solicitors for the Respondent: Mr. D. Tucker of Clarke &
KannHearing Date: 4 February, 1993
- AGLC
- Southern Cross Foods P/L v Counterpoint Marketing Services Ltd [1993] FCA 63
- Case
- [1993] FCA 63
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court reviewed the affidavits provided by the solicitor for Southern Cross Foods, which stated that no payments were made in accordance with the prior order. Given this evidence, the court concluded that Southern Cross Foods had not fulfilled the payment obligations as directed. The court held that Southern Cross Foods was liable to pay the full amount of $52,000 but denied any entitlement to interest as per the previous order. The court ordered that judgment be entered against Southern Cross Foods for the full amount of the claim, and it was to pay the costs of the action.
This decision underscores the importance of adhering to court orders, particularly when it comes to timely payment obligations. The court's ruling ensures that Counterpoint Marketing Services receives the compensation it was entitled to, reinforcing the principle that parties must abide by judicial mandates. The final order mandates Southern Cross Foods to pay the full amount of $52,000 and cover the costs associated with the litigation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.