| [2015] FWCA 1463 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Southern Cross Care (SA & NT) Inc
(AG2015/356)
SOUTHERN CROSS CARE (SA & NT) INC ALLIED HEALTH PROFESSIONALS - HSU ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Aged care industry | |
COMMISSIONER HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 3 MARCH 2015 |
Application for approval of the Southern Cross Care (SA & NT) Inc Allied Health Professionals - HSU Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Southern Cross Care (SA & NT) Inc Allied Health Professionals - HSU Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Southern Cross Care (SA & NT) Inc. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] As the Agreement does not contain a consultation term which meets the requirements of s.205(1A) of the Act, the model consultation term is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] Health Services Union of Australia - South Australian Branch, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 10 March 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE412869 PR561579>
- AGLC
- Southern Cross Care (SA & NT) Inc [2015] FWCA 1463
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 1463
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine if the agreement provided for the employees' minimum entitlements, was free from prohibited content, and was fairly and genuinely negotiated. The key issue was whether the provisions regarding shift penalties and allowances adequately met the minimum standards set by the Act. The court considered whether the agreement appropriately balanced the needs and rights of both the employer and the employees.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was compliant with the Act. The provisions for shift penalties and allowances were deemed sufficient to meet the minimum entitlements. The court concluded that the agreement was fairly and genuinely negotiated and free from any prohibited content. Consequently, the court approved the enterprise agreement, allowing it to take effect as of the specified date.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.