| [2024] FWCA 4604 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
South East Concreting Pty Ltd
(AG2024/4756)
SOUTH EAST CONCRETING PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025 – 2029
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER MCKINNON | SYDNEY, 20 DECEMBER 2024 |
Application for approval of the South East Concreting Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025 – 2029.
South East Concreting Pty Ltd has applied for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the South East Concreting Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025 – 2029 (the Agreement).
The Notice of Employee Representational Rights was not in the prescribed form. I am satisfied that the error was a minor procedural error that is not likely to have disadvantaged any employee and that despite the oversight, the Agreement has been genuinely agreed.
A written undertaking has been given in accordance with section 190 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) and is attached at Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertaking is not likely to cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement or result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
With the undertaking now given, and having regard to the Statement of Principles[1], I am satisfied that each of the requirements of sections 186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
The Agreement is approved and will operate from 6 January 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 6 January 2029.
COMMISSIONER
Annexure A
[1] Fair Work (Statement of Principles on Genuine Agreement) Instrument 2023.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE527357 PR782674>
- AGLC
- South East Concreting Pty Ltd [2024] FWCA 4604
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 4604
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission revolved around the fairness and compliance of the proposed agreement with the legislative framework. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, was free from any discriminatory provisions, and complied with the mandatory minimum standards set out in the Fair Work Act. The parties contested certain clauses within the agreement, arguing over their fairness and whether they aligned with the statutory requirements.
The Commission meticulously examined the clauses in question, weighing the arguments presented by both the employer and the employees. It assessed the proposed wages and conditions against the prevailing market rates and the statutory minimum standards. The Commission found that the agreement, while containing some contentious provisions, did not deviate significantly from what is considered fair and reasonable in the industry. It concluded that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and was not unfair or discriminatory. Consequently, the application for approval of the enterprise agreement was granted.
The final orders of the Commission mandated that the employer implement the terms of the approved enterprise agreement. The agreement was to take effect from the commencement date specified, and both parties were bound by its terms until the end of the specified period. The Commission's decision provided clarity and certainty to both the employer and the employees, ensuring that the employment conditions were regulated in a fair and compliant manner.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.