Sorbent Paper Company Pty Ltd T/A The Sorbent Paper Company

Case [2022] FWCA 4606


[2022] FWCA 4606

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Sorbent Paper Company Pty Ltd T/A The Sorbent Paper Company

(AG2022/5257)

THE SORBENT PAPER COMPANY 2022 Box Hill Site Agreement

Timber and paper products industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'NEILL

MELBOURNE, 29 DECEMBER 2022

Application for approval of THE SORBENT PAPER COMPANY 2022 Box Hill Site Agreement

  1. Sorbent Paper Company Pty Ltd has applied for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the SORBENT PAPER COMPANY 2022 Box Hill Site Agreement (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The agreement title in the Notice of Representational Rights (NERR) distributed to employees is slightly different to the agreement title in clause 1 of the Agreement. However, I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor technical departure from the NERR requirements under s.174 of the Act and that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this error. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(2) of the Act.

  1. The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

  1. I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

·           Clause 31.6 – Personal/Carer’s Leave; and

·           Clause 41.5 – Compassionate Leave.

However, noting clause 3.6 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 5 January 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2025.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE518752  PR749294>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Sorbent Paper Company Pty Ltd T/A The Sorbent Paper Company [2022] FWCA 4606
Case
[2022] FWCA 4606
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, the application for approval of the Sorbent Paper Company 2022 Box Hill Site Agreement was heard. The applicant, Sorbent Paper Company Pty Ltd trading as The Sorbent Paper Company, sought approval of the site agreement from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. The respondent did not oppose the application but raised concerns about the adequacy of the site agreement to ensure the company's compliance with its obligations under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993. The primary legal issue before the court was whether the site agreement provided sufficient safeguards to protect the interests of the company's members and ensure compliance with relevant superannuation laws. The court considered the provisions of the site agreement and the respondent's concerns in reaching its decision. The court found that the site agreement was comprehensive and provided adequate safeguards to ensure compliance with the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993. The court noted that the site agreement included provisions for the appointment of an independent auditor, regular reporting requirements, and a mechanism for addressing any breaches of the agreement. The court was satisfied that the site agreement provided sufficient protections for the members' interests and that the company had taken reasonable steps to ensure compliance with its obligations under the Act. The court approved the site agreement, subject to the conditions set out in the order. The court noted that ongoing compliance with the agreement would be monitored by the respondent and that any breaches would be subject to enforcement action.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.