Somerville v AFS Security 24/7 Pty Ltd and Ors (No.2)
Case
•
[2018] FCCA 2234
•17 August 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Somerville v AFS Security 24/7 Pty Ltd and Ors (No.2) [2018] FCCA 2234
[2018] FCCA 2234
17 August 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Somerville v AFS Security 24/7 Pty Ltd and Ors (No.2) concerned a dispute brought by the applicant, Somerville, against the respondents, AFS Security 24/7 Pty Ltd and others. The proceedings were heard in the Federal Court of Australia.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the respondents had breached their obligations under the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth) by failing to provide Somerville with a copy of the enterprise agreement that applied to his employment, and by failing to provide him with a copy of his contract of employment. Somerville also alleged that the respondents had contravened the *National Employment Standards* (NES) by failing to provide him with a written contract of employment.
In determining these issues, Judge Nicholls considered the relevant provisions of the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth), including sections 50 and 55 which deal with the provision of enterprise agreements, and section 66 which mandates the provision of written contracts of employment. The court found that the respondents had indeed failed to provide Somerville with a copy of the applicable enterprise agreement and a written contract of employment, thereby contravening their statutory obligations. The court applied the principles of statutory interpretation to ascertain the meaning and effect of these provisions.
The court ordered that the respondents pay pecuniary penalties for their contraventions of the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth).
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the respondents had breached their obligations under the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth) by failing to provide Somerville with a copy of the enterprise agreement that applied to his employment, and by failing to provide him with a copy of his contract of employment. Somerville also alleged that the respondents had contravened the *National Employment Standards* (NES) by failing to provide him with a written contract of employment.
In determining these issues, Judge Nicholls considered the relevant provisions of the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth), including sections 50 and 55 which deal with the provision of enterprise agreements, and section 66 which mandates the provision of written contracts of employment. The court found that the respondents had indeed failed to provide Somerville with a copy of the applicable enterprise agreement and a written contract of employment, thereby contravening their statutory obligations. The court applied the principles of statutory interpretation to ascertain the meaning and effect of these provisions.
The court ordered that the respondents pay pecuniary penalties for their contraventions of the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth).
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Employment Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Discovery
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Jason Deeney Chris Hughes Richard Park Denis Seiffert v Patrick Projects Pty Ltd [2018] FWC 5636
Cases Citing This Decision
1
Cases Cited
24
Statutory Material Cited
4
Somerville v AFS Security 24/7 Pty Ltd
[2018] FCCA 964
Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2)
[2001] FCA 1865
Oshlack v Richmond River Council
[1998] HCA 11