Somai and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (Citizenship)
Case
•
[2020] AATA 4087
•14 October 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Somai and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (Citizenship) [2020] AATA 4087
[2020] AATA 4087
14 October 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an application for Australian citizenship by conferral made by Mr Somai. The Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs refused the application on the basis that Mr Somai did not meet the permanent resident requirement at the time he made the application. The Administrative Appeals Tribunal was required to determine when Mr Somai's application for citizenship was considered to have been "made" for the purposes of the eligibility criteria.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was the interpretation of the phrase "at the time the person made the application" as it appears in section 21(2)(b)(i) of the *Australian Citizenship Act 2007* (Cth). This required the Tribunal to determine whether the application was "made" when it was posted by the applicant or when it was received by the Department. A related issue was whether Mr Somai held permanent resident status at the time the application was made, given his departure from Australia with an expired travel facility.
The Tribunal found that Mr Somai's status as a permanent resident ceased when he departed Australia on 19 April 2018, as his underlying visa's five-year travel facility had expired. Therefore, as of 20 April 2018, he was not a permanent resident and thus ineligible for citizenship. Regarding the timing of the application, the Tribunal considered analogous case law, including *North West Traffic Area Licensing Authority v Brady*, which held that an application is "made" when it is posted, not when it is received, particularly where the legislation is to be construed in favour of the applicant. Applying this principle, and noting that the application was posted on or about 16 April 2018 but received and date-stamped on 20 April 2018, the Tribunal concluded that the application was made on 16 April 2018.
The Tribunal set aside the decision under review and remitted the matter to the Department for reconsideration of Mr Somai's eligibility for citizenship by conferral, having found that he was a permanent resident at the time his application was made.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was the interpretation of the phrase "at the time the person made the application" as it appears in section 21(2)(b)(i) of the *Australian Citizenship Act 2007* (Cth). This required the Tribunal to determine whether the application was "made" when it was posted by the applicant or when it was received by the Department. A related issue was whether Mr Somai held permanent resident status at the time the application was made, given his departure from Australia with an expired travel facility.
The Tribunal found that Mr Somai's status as a permanent resident ceased when he departed Australia on 19 April 2018, as his underlying visa's five-year travel facility had expired. Therefore, as of 20 April 2018, he was not a permanent resident and thus ineligible for citizenship. Regarding the timing of the application, the Tribunal considered analogous case law, including *North West Traffic Area Licensing Authority v Brady*, which held that an application is "made" when it is posted, not when it is received, particularly where the legislation is to be construed in favour of the applicant. Applying this principle, and noting that the application was posted on or about 16 April 2018 but received and date-stamped on 20 April 2018, the Tribunal concluded that the application was made on 16 April 2018.
The Tribunal set aside the decision under review and remitted the matter to the Department for reconsideration of Mr Somai's eligibility for citizenship by conferral, having found that he was a permanent resident at the time his application was made.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
-
Jurisdiction
-
Standing
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs v Broide [2025] FCA 13
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Cases Cited
10
Statutory Material Cited
0
Rasmini and Minister for Home Affairs (Citizenship)
[2018] AATA 3465
Secretary Department of Family & Community Services v Haagar
[2001] FCA 1284
Collector of Customs v AGFA-Gevaert Ltd
[1996] HCA 36