| [2019] FWCA 3358 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Snap Fresh Pty Limited T/A Snap Fresh
(AG2018/5981)
SNAP FRESH PTY LIMITED AGREEMENT 6 2018-2021
Airport operations | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MILLHOUSE | MELBOURNE, 17 MAY 2019 |
Application for approval of the Snap Fresh Pty Limited Agreement 6 2018-2021.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Snap Fresh Pty Limited Agreement 6 2018-2021 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Snap Fresh Pty Limited T/A Snap Fresh (Employer). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 24 May 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 May 2021.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE503449 PR708331>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Snap Fresh Pty Limited T/A Snap Fresh [2019] FWCA 3358
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 3358
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the proposed agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms of employment, considering the relevant factors under the Fair Work Act. This included assessing whether the agreement complied with the ‘better off overall test’ (BOOT), which requires that employees be no worse off and at least some employees be better off financially compared to the applicable award or registered agreement. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the agreement adhered to the ‘good faith’ requirement, ensuring that the terms were not unduly harsh, inflexible, or oppressive.
The court examined the agreement in detail, weighing the proposed changes against the existing conditions and the relevant award. It concluded that the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms for employees, meeting the BOOT and good faith requirements. The proposed changes included adjustments to hours, penalties, and leave provisions, which were found to benefit employees in various ways, such as through increased flexibility and improved leave entitlements. The court was satisfied that the agreement did not introduce any unduly harsh, inflexible, or oppressive terms.
The Fair Work Commission approved the agreement, allowing it to come into effect as intended. This decision ensures that Snap Fresh Pty Limited can operate under the agreed terms, providing a clear framework for employment conditions over the specified period.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.