Smittey and Smittey

In the matter of *Smittey and Smittey*, the parties involved were the applicants, Smittey and Smittey. The dispute concerned proposed orders, the precise nature of which is not detailed in the provided text, but which were presented to the Court for approval. The decision was made by Justice Cronin.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether to approve and make orders in accordance with the minutes of proposed orders presented by the parties. This involved considering the particulars of the obligations created by those orders, the potential consequences of contravention, and information regarding assistance for parties to comply with the orders, as mandated by sections 65DA(2) and 62B of the relevant legislation.

Justice Cronin, by consent of the parties, made orders in accordance with the minutes of proposed orders. These minutes were marked as Exhibit "A", sealed, and attached to the Court's formal orders, with a direction that they remain on the Court file. The Court further directed that the particulars of the obligations, consequences of contravention, and details of available assistance, as set out in an attached Fact Sheet, be included within these orders, pursuant to sections 65DA(2) and 62B.