[2016] FWCA 1898
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 |
| s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement |
| SMIT Marine Australia Pty Ltd |
| (AG2016/472) |
SMIT MARINE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD AND AMOU ENTERPRISE
AGREEMENT 2015
Maritime industry
| COMMISSIONER SIMPSON | BRISBANE, 5 APRIL 2016 |
Application for approval of the SMIT Marine Australia Pty Ltd and AMOU Enterprise
Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the
SMIT Marine Australia Pty Ltd and AMOU Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The
Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been
made by SMIT Marine Australia Pty Ltd.
[2] The Applicant has requested that the Commission not include for publication
Appendix 1 to the Agreement, which contains key operating documents, the rosters of work
and the operational standards, prime tugs last steam times and the crew roster. The basis for
this request involves matters of commercial sensitivity. I am prepared to grant this request and
the Agreement will be published without Appendix 1 to the Agreement being disclosed.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to
this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Australian Maritime Officers’ Union being a bargaining representative for the
Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In
accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code {G}, AE418366 PR578383>
[2016] FWCA 1898
- AGLC
- SMIT Marine Australia Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 1898
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 1898
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the Agreement met the statutory requirements for approval and if it was appropriate to exclude Appendix 1 from publication. The court considered the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically sections 185, 186, 187, 188, and 201(2), to determine if the application for approval was valid. The court also examined the commercial sensitivity of the documents in Appendix 1 to decide if their exclusion from publication was justified.
The Commissioner found that all relevant statutory requirements for approval of the Agreement were satisfied. The Agreement was approved and would operate in accordance with section 54 of the Act. The Commissioner also granted the applicant's request to exclude Appendix 1 from publication due to its commercial sensitivity. The Agreement was approved and would be published without the sensitive documents outlined in Appendix 1.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.