SLATER & REMINGTON

In the matter of *Slater & Remington*, Judge Lapthorn considered parenting orders concerning two children, X and Y. The dispute involved the significant geographical distance between the parents' residences and the children's history of instability, with a focus on the importance of stability for the children.

The court was required to determine the appropriate parenting arrangements for the children, including the allocation of parental responsibility and the specific time the children would spend with each parent. Additionally, the court addressed an application by the mother for reimbursement of airfares incurred in recovering the children, as well as the discharge of previous orders and the appointment of an Independent Children's Lawyer.

Judge Lapthorn applied the paramountcy principle, prioritising the best interests of the children. The court found that while equal shared parental responsibility was appropriate, the children would live with the mother to provide greater stability. The father's time with the children was structured to accommodate varying distances between his residence and the children's school, with detailed provisions for school holidays and weekend contact. The court also made orders restraining denigration of either parent and requiring the father to obtain leave before filing future parenting applications. The mother's application for reimbursement of airfares was dismissed.