| [2015] FWCA 6065 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
SKYCITY Darwin Pty Ltd
(AG2015/4671)
SKYCITY DARWIN PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015-2018
Northern Territory | |
COMMISSIONER MCKENNA | SYDNEY, 3 SEPTEMBER 2015 |
Application for approval of the SKYCITY Darwin Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015-2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the SKYCITY Darwin Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015-2018 (“the Agreement”). The application has been made by SKYCITY Darwin Pty Ltd (“the applicant”) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The application was not made within time, but I consider that in all the circumstances it is fair to extend time for lodgement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval has been met. The applicant has provided written undertakings addressing miscellaneous matters. A copy of the undertakings is attached to this decision and marked “Annexure A”. I note that, under s.191 of the Act, the undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement.
[4] United Voice Northern Territory Branch concurs with the undertakings and has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wishes to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date is 1 February 2018.
COMMISSIONER
ANNEXURE A
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE415551 PR571476>
- AGLC
- SKYCITY Darwin Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 6065
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 6065
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered various aspects of the agreement, including wage increases, working conditions, and procedural fairness. The key legal issue was whether the agreement provided employees with a sufficient benefit to be considered 'better off overall' than their previous conditions. The court also assessed whether the agreement contained appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms and whether it adhered to the procedural requirements of the Fair Work Act.
In its decision, the court found that the proposed agreement did indeed meet the 'better off overall test' and satisfied the other statutory requirements. The agreement was deemed to offer a fair balance of benefits and obligations, providing employees with enhanced conditions while also accommodating the employer's operational needs. The court approved the enterprise agreement, noting that it was fair and appropriate for the circumstances. The final orders confirmed the approval of the agreement, subject to the parties' compliance with the terms and conditions set forth.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.