Skinner and Cluny (No. 3)
Case
•
[2011] FamCA 723
•06 September 2011
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
SKINNER & CLUNY (NO. 3)
[2011] FamCA 723
[2011] FamCA 723
06 September 2011
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Skinner and Cluny (No. 3)*, Kent J of the Family Court of Australia considered an application by the Husband filed on 12 September 2011. The precise nature of the dispute is not detailed in the provided text, but it involved proceedings before the Family Court.
The central legal issue before the court was the appropriate procedural step to be taken in relation to the Husband's application. The court was required to determine whether to grant the application, adjourn it, or make other directions concerning its progression.
Kent J ordered that the Husband's application be adjourned to 3.00pm on 13 October 2011, with directions to be given by Registrar Coutts. The court further ordered that the costs of and incidental to these proceedings be reserved to the trial judge, indicating that a final determination on costs would be made at a later stage of the litigation.
The central legal issue before the court was the appropriate procedural step to be taken in relation to the Husband's application. The court was required to determine whether to grant the application, adjourn it, or make other directions concerning its progression.
Kent J ordered that the Husband's application be adjourned to 3.00pm on 13 October 2011, with directions to be given by Registrar Coutts. The court further ordered that the costs of and incidental to these proceedings be reserved to the trial judge, indicating that a final determination on costs would be made at a later stage of the litigation.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
SKINNER & CLUNY (NO. 3)
[2011] FamCA 723
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
1
Queensland v JL holdings Pty Ltd
[1997] HCA 1
Queensland v JL holdings Pty Ltd
[1997] HCA 1