| [2019] FWCA 4291 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Skilled Workforce Solutions (NSW) Pty Ltd
(AG2019/517)
SKILLED WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS (NSW) PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019
Coal industry | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 25 JUNE 2019 |
Application for approval of the Skilled Workforce Solutions (NSW) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Skilled Workforce Solutions (NSW) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Skilled Workforce Solutions (NSW) Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] I observe that the following provision is likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
• Clause 23 – Paid Personal/ Carer’s Leave
However, noting clause 3.4 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 2 July 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 14 February 2023.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE504027 PR709543>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Skilled Workforce Solutions (NSW) Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 4291
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 4291
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated, whether it met the requirements for a simple or low-paid agreement, and if the provisions were fair and reasonable. The court had to examine the process of negotiation, the content of the agreement, and its impact on employees. The objectors raised concerns about specific clauses related to wages, leave entitlements, and termination provisions.
The Fair Work Commission determined that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and met the requirements of the Act. The court found that the negotiation process was robust and involved multiple meetings between the parties. Regarding the content, the court held that the provisions were fair and reasonable, taking into account the nature of the work and the bargaining positions of the parties. The wage and leave provisions were deemed to be in line with industry standards, and the termination clauses were found to be consistent with common law principles.
The application was approved, and the Enterprise Agreement 2019 was registered. The court noted that the agreement provided a fair and reasonable outcome for both the employer and employees, and it was in compliance with the legislative framework. The objectors’ concerns were addressed and found to be without merit.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.