Sinha and Sharma and Anor
Case
•
[2019] FCCA 3244
•14 November 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Sinha and Sharma and Anor [2019] FCCA 3244
[2019] FCCA 3244
14 November 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Sinha and Sharma and Anor*, heard before Judge A. Kelly, the dispute concerned the proposed orders to be made following the court's reasons for judgment. The parties involved were Sinha and Sharma, along with another party referred to as "Anor".
The primary legal issue before the court was the formulation of a minute of proposed orders that would give effect to the court's prior judgment. This involved identifying areas of agreement and disagreement between the parties regarding the specific terms of those orders.
Judge A. Kelly directed the parties to file and serve a minute of proposed order by a specified date, outlining any agreed or disagreed terms. The proceeding was subsequently listed for mention to address these proposed orders, with liberty granted to the parties to apply on short notice. Crucially, the costs of and incidental to the proceeding were reserved by the court.
The primary legal issue before the court was the formulation of a minute of proposed orders that would give effect to the court's prior judgment. This involved identifying areas of agreement and disagreement between the parties regarding the specific terms of those orders.
Judge A. Kelly directed the parties to file and serve a minute of proposed order by a specified date, outlining any agreed or disagreed terms. The proceeding was subsequently listed for mention to address these proposed orders, with liberty granted to the parties to apply on short notice. Crucially, the costs of and incidental to the proceeding were reserved by the court.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
23
Statutory Material Cited
3
Jabour & Jabour
[2019] FamCAFC 78
Briginshaw v Briginshaw
[1938] HCA 34
Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick
[2002] HCA 56